论美国法下资产收购中的继受人责任制度

发布时间：2018-01-15 10:36

本文关键词：论美国法下资产收购中的继受人责任制度　出处：《北京外国语大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本文目的在于梳理、分析美国资产收购中一项特殊的第三方利益保护制度——继受人责任制度,探讨继受人责任制度背后的理论争议,比较分析我国相关制度,为我国进一步明确、发展资产收购中的第三方利益保护制度借鉴与参考。本文第一部分梳理、分析了美国法中的继受人责任制度,并将继受人责任制度分为三个阶段:(1)传统的以保护债权人利益为目的的继受人责任制度、(2)以保护消费者或缺陷产品被侵权人为目的的产品责任继受人责任制度、(3)联邦法下的继受人责任制度(以联邦环境法为例)。通过分析具有代表性的美国法院判例,笔者试图阐明继受人责任制度适用的情境,并得出本部分结论:在传统继受人责任制度下,买方只要在资产交易中支付了充足的现金对价,保障债权人债权的实现,就可以很大程度上免予承担继受人责任;然而,由于严格产品责任公共政策的要求,即使支付了充足的现金对价,为保护消费者或产品被侵权人利益,法院依然可能要求买方承担继受人责任;最后,源于州法的继受人责任制度在联邦法也有迅速的发展,联邦法院倾向于在联邦法中适用广泛的继受人责任制度。基于第一部分对法律的梳理,本文第二部分着重探讨继受人责任制度中的理论问题:保护商业交易可预见性与维护债权人、消费者等第三方利益之间的冲突、广泛的权利救济与法律不确定性之间的冲突、成本社会化理论与商誉商号标准。通过对理论问题的思考,加深对继受人责任制度的理解。本文第三部分为美国法下继受人责任制度对我国的借鉴与启示。通过归纳总结我国相关制度,并与美国法下继受人责任制度比较、分析,提出建议:我国应进一步明确资产收购中的债权债务承继制度,并在此基础上关注对未来、潜在债权的救济,关注产品责任、环境责任以及其他法律中的继受人责任承担制度。
[Abstract]:The purpose of this paper is to sort out, analysis of the acquisition of assets in a special system to protect the interests of the third party successor liability system, to explore the following theoretical controversy by responsibility behind the system, comparative analysis of the system of our country, for our country to further clarify the development, acquisition of assets in the system to protect the interests of the third parties for reference. The first part of this paper combs, analyses the successor liability system, and the successor liability system is divided into three stages: (1) the traditional to protect the interests of creditors for the purpose of the successor liability system, (2) to protect consumers or defective products are for the purpose of the product liability successor liability system, (3) federal law under the successor liability system (with federal environmental law cases). Through the analysis of the representative of the United States Court cases, the author tries to clarify the successor liability system applicable to the situation, and This part draws conclusions: traditional successor liability system, as long as the buyer in exchange for the assets to pay sufficient cash on the price, guarantee the realization of creditor's rights, can be largely exempted from liability for successor liability; however, due to the strict product liability of public policy, even if sufficient cash to pay the price for the consumer protection or Product Infringement interests, the court still may require the buyer to assume the successor liability; finally, from state law the successor liability system in federal law also has rapid development, the federal courts tend to under federal law, widely applicable the successor liability system. The first part combs the law is based on the second part of this paper focuses on the following theoretical problems by liability in commercial transactions: protection of predictability and maintenance of creditors, the conflict between consumers and three party interests, extensive right The conflict between uncertainty and legal relief, social cost theory and the goodwill standard. By thinking of the firm theory, deepen the understanding of the successor liability system. The third part is the United States under the successor liability system of our country's reference and inspiration. Through the summary of related system in China and with the United States, following the law, by liability analysis, put forward suggestions: China should further clarify the acquisition of assets in debt inherited system, and on this basis, focus on the future, potential debt relief, pay attention to product liability, environmental liability and other laws of the successor liability system.

【学位授予单位】：北京外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D971.2;DD912.29

【参考文献】