湖南王跃文诉河北王跃文侵犯著作权案分析

发布时间：2018-01-26 02:41

本文关键词： 著作权姓名权反不正当竞争假冒他人署名　出处：《湖南大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：假冒作者姓名，是一种出现频率越来越高的侵权行为，但以现行《著作权法》又不能完全认定其侵犯著作权并规制之。这种行为既损害作者的声誉（人格），又损害作者的财产利益，实际上是利用了作者姓名所具有的商业声誉,是对作者姓名的商品化的权利或利益的侵害：既不是纯粹的人格利益（姓名权），也不是单一的经济利益（不正当竞争），而是两者的结合——人格利益的商品化。湖南王跃文诉河北王跃文侵犯著作权案就属于这类行为的典型案例。河北一位原名王立山的人在将名字改为王跃文后，其作品小说《国风》得到了出版和发行，在该书的作者简介和宣传资料中存在虚假内容，导致消费者产生与湖南知名作家王跃文的联想，湖南王跃文遂起诉河北王跃文及出版社、发行公司侵犯其著作权。关于该案件，存在着两个争议焦点，一是《国风》是否是假冒他人署名的侵犯著作权的作品，二是发行《国风》是否是不正当竞争行为。通过具体分析著作权侵权责任与一般侵权责任的区别，可以判断，依据现行法律，该书并不是侵犯著作权的作品。假冒他人署名存在着不同的情况，针对不同的情况有不同的规制方法，主要包括姓名权、著作权中的署名权和反不正当竞争。关于这三种调整方法，司法实践中存在着一定的分歧，目前还没有定论。本案最后的判决结果认定被告存在不正当竞争行为，承担赔偿责任，这说明尽管反不正当竞争法与知识产权法既存在着联系也有区别，但反不正当竞争法对知识产权起到了一种兜底性保护的作用。在未来，做好著作权法和反不正当竞争法的修法工作，扩大著作权向知名权的引申，防止著作权的滥用，，加强著作权侵权的救济措施，尤其是完善姓名权、署名权和反不正当竞争对假冒他人署名的调整方式并能够综合利用，都是更好的保护著作权可行的手段。
[Abstract]:Impersonating the author's name is a kind of infringing act which appears more and more frequently, but the current copyright Law can not completely confirm its infringing copyright and regulate it. This kind of behavior not only damages the author's reputation (personality). Damage to the property interests of the author, in fact, is the use of the commercial reputation of the author's name, is the commercialization of the name of the right or interests of the infringement: neither purely personal interests (name right). Nor is it a single economic interest (unfair competition, but the combination of the two-the commercialization of personality interests. " The case of Wang Yue-wen of Hunan Province v. Wang Yue-wen of Hebei Province is a typical case of such an act. A former name of Wang Li-shan in Hebei Province was changed to Wang Yue-wen after his name was changed to Wang Yue-wen. The novel "Guofeng" has been published and published, and there are false contents in the author's brief introduction and propaganda materials, which leads to the association of consumers with Wang Yue-wen, a famous writer in Hunan Province. Hunan Wang Yuewen sues Hebei Wang Yuewen and the publishing house, the distribution company infringes its copyright. There are two controversial points about the case, one is whether "Guofeng" is a copyright infringing work that impersonates another person's signature. The second is whether the issue of "Guofeng" is an act of unfair competition. Through the specific analysis of the difference between copyright tort liability and general tort liability, we can judge, according to the current law. The book is not an infringement of copyright works. There are different situations of impersonating others' signatures, and there are different regulation methods for different situations, including the right to name. The right of authorship and anti-unfair competition in copyright. There are some differences in judicial practice about these three adjustment methods. At present, there is no final conclusion. The final judgment of this case found that the defendant was guilty of unfair competition and assumed liability for compensation, which shows that although there are links and differences between anti-unfair competition law and intellectual property law. However, anti-unfair competition law has played a role in protecting intellectual property rights. In the future, we should do a good job in amending copyright law and anti-unfair competition law, and expand the extension of copyright to well-known rights. To prevent the abuse of copyright, to strengthen the relief measures of copyright infringement, especially to improve the right of name, the right of signature and anti-unfair competition to fake other people's signature adjustment and comprehensive utilization. It is a better way to protect copyright.
【学位授予单位】：湖南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D923.41;D920.5

【参考文献】