岳麓书院藏秦简“尸等捕盗疑购”案所见逮捕群盗的奖赏规定
发布时间:2018-02-09 11:31
本文关键词: 岳麓书院藏秦简 《为狱等状四种》 《二年律令》 奖赏 群盗 出处:《中国社会经济史研究》2014年03期 论文类型:期刊论文
【摘要】:本文先分析岳麓书院藏秦简《为狱等状四种》"尸等捕盗疑购"案所见逮捕群盗的奖赏规定,然后将此与张家山汉简《二年律令》进行比较,对逮捕群盗的奖赏制度的变迁及其背景进行考察。逮捕行"盗"(包括群盗)的外国人后进行奖赏,战国时期的秦律按照其外国人是否由他国动员为士兵而区别,但这种区别在汉初之前被废除。这可认为是因为秦国在统一六国时灭亡秦以外的战国诸国家,已经不需要这种区别。另外,秦律规定每生捕群盗一人奖赏黄金十四两,而《二年律令》规定赐爵一级。这可能是对应汉初爵位的通胀现象的,而未必是企图提高逮捕群盗的奖赏的。
[Abstract]:This paper first analyzes the reward rules for arresting group thieves, which are found in the case of the case of "the body of the body", and then compares it with the Zhang Jia Shan Han Bamboo slips, "the Law order of two years", in the case of "four kinds of conditions of imprisonment", which are found in Yuelu Academy. This paper investigates the changes and background of the reward system of arresting group theft. After arresting foreigners who commit "theft" (including group theft), the law of Qin Dynasty in the warring States period is distinguished according to whether the foreigners are mobilized as soldiers by other countries. However, this distinction was abolished before the beginning of the Han Dynasty. This may be attributed to the fact that the Qin State did not need this distinction when it destroyed the warring States other than the six Kingdoms. The order of two years provides for the granting of the rank of viscount, which may be in response to the inflation of the title in the early Han Dynasty, not necessarily in an attempt to increase the reward for the arrest of bandits.
【作者单位】: 厦门大学历史学系;
【分类号】:D929;D924.3
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 贾兵强;;楚国粮食产量测算研究[J];安徽农业科学;2012年12期
2 井上和人;吴丽丹;;渤海上京龙泉府形制新考[J];边疆考古研究;2005年00期
3 王智远;;旅顺博物馆藏青铜器概述[J];边疆考古研究;2007年00期
4 贾亭立;陈薇;;中国古代城墙的垛口墙形制演进轨迹[J];东南大学学报(自然科学版);2010年02期
5 赵克功;长度计量基本单位——“米”的定义及其复现[J];大学物理;2003年04期
6 张丽丹;;古琴琴徽的产生探究综述[J];大众文艺;2011年22期
7 肖e,
本文编号:1497830
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/1497830.html