实质法律推理的方法反思与建构——以典型案例分析为视角

发布时间：2018-03-16 11:11

本文选题：实质法律推理　切入点：方法反思　出处：《法学杂志》2017年09期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：法律推理是重要的法律方法,特别是实质法律推理对疑难案件的处理更具有不可替代的作用。基于对我国近年来典型案例法律推理的实证分析发现,司法实践中的实质法律推理普遍存在正常适用缺失、标准选择不当、逻辑混乱和适用条件不准确等问题,而导致实质法律推理运用存在问题的原因主要是推理过程中存在思维阻隔、技术障碍、社会舆论不当干预。因此,仔细斟酌实质法律推理的运用条件、严格筛选实质法律推理的标准、克服实质法律推理适用的心理障碍,以及充分把握实质法律推理的运用技术是提高实质法律推理运用效果的基本对策。
[Abstract]:Legal reasoning is an important legal method, especially the substantial legal reasoning plays an irreplaceable role in the handling of difficult cases. In judicial practice, there are some problems such as lack of normal application, improper choice of standard, confusion of logic and inaccurate conditions of application, etc. The main reasons that lead to the problems in the application of substantive legal reasoning are thought barrier, technical obstacle and improper intervention of social public opinion in the process of reasoning. Therefore, carefully consider the application conditions of substantive legal reasoning. Strict screening of the standard of substantive legal reasoning, overcoming the psychological obstacles in the application of substantive legal reasoning, and fully grasping the application technology of substantive legal reasoning are the basic countermeasures to improve the application effect of substantive legal reasoning.
【作者单位】：山西大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“综合改革试验区先行先试政策与法治一体化建设研究”(项目编号:12BFX003) 山西省高级人民法院2013年重大司法调研课题“完善司法统计与案件质量评估体系调研”的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D90-051

【相似文献】