派生诉讼何以可能:反思与超越——以日本派生诉讼的发展为出发点

发布时间：2018-05-16 18:49

本文选题：派生诉讼 + 理性经济人　；参考：《北方法学》2017年03期

【摘要】：传统理论认为,原告股东在决定是否提起派生诉讼时以理性经济人自居,基于成本与收益进行衡量。日本诉讼费用改革后派生诉讼案例急剧上升则是该传统理论强有力的佐证。然而,这一传统观点不仅在逻辑上难以自圆其说,也不符合日本派生诉讼的实际情况,日本股东提起派生诉讼很大程度上受到准理性和有限理性行为的影响。日本这一实践对我国派生诉讼的有效实施无疑可带来启发:即在反思派生诉讼利用率为何如此之少时,不应仅关注制度设计,还应超越制度本身,考量该制度得以实施与发挥效用的其它外在因素。
[Abstract]:According to the traditional theory, the plaintiff shareholder considers himself as a rational economic person when deciding whether to file a derivative action, which is measured on the basis of cost and income. The sharp rise of derivative litigation cases after the reform of litigation costs in Japan is a strong evidence of this traditional theory. However, this traditional view is not only difficult to justify itself in logic, but also does not accord with the actual situation of derivative litigation in Japan. To a large extent, Japanese shareholders' derivative actions are influenced by quasi-rational and limited rational actions. This practice in Japan can undoubtedly bring inspiration to the effective implementation of derivative litigation in our country: that is, when we reflect on why the utilization rate of derivative litigation is so small, we should not only pay attention to the design of the system, but also go beyond the system itself. Consider other external factors for the system to be implemented and effective.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学民商法学院;特华博士后科研工作站;
【基金】：中国法学会2016年课题“《公司法》私人执行之评估”[CLS(2016)C27] 司法部2016年课题“遗嘱信托法律构造的困境及其出路”(16SFB3035) 重庆市2014年社会科学规划项目“证券法执行机制的评测与量化研究”(2014BS050)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D922.291.91;D931.3;DD912.29

【相似文献】