被告人李某涉嫌受贿罪一案评析

发布时间：2018-05-22 07:51

本文选题：受贿 + 准自首　；参考：《湖南大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：受贿是腐败的重要表现形式之一，在国家工作人员职务犯罪中处于突出位置，受贿犯罪也是我国刑法一直以来打击的重点，为此国家先后在刑法及其相关司法解释中，对受贿犯罪的认定及处罚作出了较详细的法律规定，但由于我国成文法滞后于受贿犯罪现实的特征及相关法律规定用语的不确定性，在司法实务中，引起广泛关注和争论。李某受贿案就存在以下争论：行为人利用职务上的便利，在收受他人财物、为他人谋取利益后，在案发前退还其所收受的财物的行为是否仍构成受贿罪？行为人在过年过节期间收受他人送予的财物的行为，倒底是受贿行为还是正常的人情往来？行为人在被纪检监察机关“双规”期间，如实向办案机关交代其犯罪事实的行为，是否构成职务犯罪中的准自首？针对上述三个争议的问题，依据刑法及相关司法解释之规定，如行为人主观上没有受贿故意，同时其在收受财物后“及时归还或上交”，则不构成受贿罪；如行为人主观上有受贿的故意，后“因自身或者与其受贿有关联的人、事被查处，为掩饰犯罪而退还或上交的”，则应当以受贿罪对行为人定罪处罚；所以区分两种行为性质的关键，应当从行为人退还或上交财物时的主观心态和客观情况两个方面来综合分析，但以客观情况为主。关于行为人在过年过节期间收受财物行为性质的问题，则需从行为人是否利用了职务便利、是否为他人谋取了利益以及收受财物数额的大小等方面去分析，判断其行为是受贿行为还是人情往来。行为人在自动投案后，在“双规”期间如实交代自己的犯罪事实的，构成一般自首；行为人在没有自动投案的前提下，其在“双规”期间如实交代办案机关尚未掌握的犯罪事实的，不管是同种犯罪事实还是不同种犯罪事实，都构成职务犯罪中的准自首；行为人在没有自动投案的前提下，其在“双规”期间如实交代办案机关已掌握的犯罪事实的，，则构成坦白。
[Abstract]:Bribery is one of the important manifestations of corruption . In the country ' s criminal law and its related judicial interpretation , the author gives more detailed legal provisions on the cognizance and punishment of the crime of accepting bribes .

In view of the above three disputes , according to the provisions of the Criminal Law and the relevant judicial interpretation , if the actor has no intention of accepting bribes , and it is " returned or handed over in a timely manner " after receiving the property , it shall not constitute a bribe crime ;
If the perpetrator is subject to the intention of accepting bribes , the person who is associated with his or her bribery shall be investigated and returned or handed over to conceal the crime , then the perpetrator shall be convicted and punished with the crime of accepting bribes ;
Therefore , it is the key to distinguish the two types of behavior , which should be analyzed synthetically from two aspects : the subjective attitude and the objective condition when the perpetrator is returned or handed over to the property , but the objective condition is mainly .

On the question of the property of the behavior person receiving the property during the festival , it is necessary to analyze whether the actor has taken advantage of his position convenience , whether he has taken advantage of the advantage of others and the size of the amount of the property , and whether his or her behavior is a bribe or a person .

In the case of automatic surrender , the perpetrator delivered his own criminal facts truthfully during the " two rules " , thus constituting a general self - surrender ;
In the absence of automatic surrender , the perpetrator , in the course of the " double regulation " , faithfully handed over the criminal facts which the case - handling organ has not yet grasped , whether it is the same crime or the different criminal fact , constituting the quasi - surrender in the crime of duty ;
In the absence of an automatic surrender , the perpetrator made a confession in the case of a criminal fact that has been seized by the case - handling organ during the " double - regulation " period .
【学位授予单位】：湖南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D924.3;D920.5

【参考文献】