立法成本收益评估的发展困境

发布时间：2018-05-23 11:29

本文选题：立法评估 + 成本-收益　；参考：《法学评论》2017年05期

【摘要】：立法成本收益评估主要遵循"卡尔多-希克斯原理"来开展评估活动。但该经济学原理在立法领域的运用,常常与公平、正义等基本法律观念相冲突。由此,立法者通过经济手段解决立法问题的方法就遭遇了形式合理性危机。例如不确定性难题、道德难题以及功利主义难题引发的技术性障碍。而国内外立法成本收益评估制度的比较研究显示,"民主"原则与"效率"原则、"程序设定"与"决策依据"可以统一于"成本-收益"评估过程中,从而构建起立法成本收益评估的制度基础。但是,立法成本收益评估对立法决策的有效干预,需要克服自身的运行成本问题,否则将违背"成本-收益"评估的基本原理。
[Abstract]:Legislative cost-benefit evaluation mainly follows the Cardox principle to carry out the evaluation activities. However, the application of this economic principle in the legislative field often conflicts with the basic legal concepts such as fairness and justice. Therefore, the method of legislator to solve the legislative problem by economic means encountered the crisis of formal rationality. Such as uncertainty problems, moral problems and utilitarian problems caused by technical obstacles. The comparative study of domestic and foreign legislative cost-benefit evaluation system shows that "democratic" principle and "efficiency" principle, "procedure setting" and "decision basis" can be unified in the evaluation process of "cost-benefit". So as to construct the system basis of legislative cost-benefit evaluation. However, the effective intervention of legislative cost-benefit evaluation on legislative decision-making needs to overcome the problem of its own operating cost, otherwise, it will violate the basic principle of "cost-benefit" evaluation.
【作者单位】：广州大学法学院;
【基金】：2014年度国家社科基金一般项目《宪法视角下人权司法保障研究》(项目编号:14BFX023)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D920.0

【相似文献】