论私法的公共性维度——“公共性私法行为”的四维体系
发布时间：2018-07-21 16:29
【摘要】：今日之私法已不纯然是关乎私人领域的法律,私法中存在公共关系与公共利益,且这种公共关系及公共利益元素几乎遍及私法的全部,从私人财产权、到私法主体、再到私法行为以及私法责任,都体现了超越传统私法形象的公共性的一面。公共财产权、公共法人、公共民事/商事行为、公共私法责任的兴起,是否意味着要对传统的私法结构进行重构?我们用何种法律模式去调整公共民事/商事行为?这是今天经常被忽略的问题。一些国家采取单行法模式回应私法公共性的部分领域,例如,对公共法人,单独制定公共企业法予以调整,对公共财产单独制定公共财政法/财产法予以保护。此种集约立法,有助于凸显私法行为的公共性,引起社会对其特别关注。但私法的公共性在不同领域,其表现程度存在差异,并非所有"公共性的表现"均需单独立法。惟在观念上,有必要形成"公共民事/商事行为"的法律架构,以公法及私法的观念,交错调整该种行为,才能构造适当规范,满足公共性私法行为之调整需求——遗憾的是,此前的私法构往往忽略这种观念。
[Abstract]:Today's private law is not purely related to the private field of law, private law exists in public relations and public interests, and this kind of public relations and public interests almost all elements of private law, from private property rights to private subjects, Then to the private law behavior and the private law responsibility, has manifested surpasses the traditional private law image the public aspect. Does the rise of public property right, public legal person, public civil / commercial behavior and public private law liability mean to reconstruct the traditional private law structure? What legal model do we use to regulate public civil / commercial conduct? This is a problem that is often overlooked today. Some countries adopt a separate law model to respond to some areas of the public nature of private law. For example, the public legal person is regulated by a separate public enterprise law, and the public property is protected by a separate public finance law / property law. This kind of intensive legislation is helpful to highlight the publicity of private law behavior and arouse the society's special attention to it. However, the publicity of private law is different in different fields, and not all "public performance" should be legislated separately. However, it is necessary to form a legal framework of "public civil / commercial acts" in view of the concept of public law and private law, and adjust this kind of behavior in a staggered manner, in order to construct appropriate norms and meet the needs of the adjustment of public private law acts. Previous private law structures often ignored this idea.
【作者单位】： 北京大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大项目“社会主义市场经济中的公共商行为及其规制——勘定政府与国企的契约边界研究”(项目号:14ZDC019)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D920.0
本文编号：2136115
[Abstract]:Today's private law is not purely related to the private field of law, private law exists in public relations and public interests, and this kind of public relations and public interests almost all elements of private law, from private property rights to private subjects, Then to the private law behavior and the private law responsibility, has manifested surpasses the traditional private law image the public aspect. Does the rise of public property right, public legal person, public civil / commercial behavior and public private law liability mean to reconstruct the traditional private law structure? What legal model do we use to regulate public civil / commercial conduct? This is a problem that is often overlooked today. Some countries adopt a separate law model to respond to some areas of the public nature of private law. For example, the public legal person is regulated by a separate public enterprise law, and the public property is protected by a separate public finance law / property law. This kind of intensive legislation is helpful to highlight the publicity of private law behavior and arouse the society's special attention to it. However, the publicity of private law is different in different fields, and not all "public performance" should be legislated separately. However, it is necessary to form a legal framework of "public civil / commercial acts" in view of the concept of public law and private law, and adjust this kind of behavior in a staggered manner, in order to construct appropriate norms and meet the needs of the adjustment of public private law acts. Previous private law structures often ignored this idea.
【作者单位】： 北京大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大项目“社会主义市场经济中的公共商行为及其规制——勘定政府与国企的契约边界研究”(项目号:14ZDC019)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D920.0
【相似文献】
中国期刊全文数据库 前9条
1 王晋;;税收规避与私法行为[J];广西财经学院学报;2006年01期
2 李延奎;;论民事撤诉合意[J];劳动保障世界(理论版);2011年12期
3 蔡坤展;;税收筹划是否为权利——从富人税争议谈起[J];理论界;2013年05期
4 潘光晔;;论强制拍卖的性质[J];科教文汇(上旬刊);2008年01期
5 耿林;诉讼上抵销的性质[J];清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2004年03期
6 韩秀义;荣敬;;商人登记法律性质辨析[J];辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版);2008年01期
7 葛治华,邓兴广,葛成;物业管理之法律属性解析[J];河北法学;2004年04期
8 杨解君,裘坚建;行政补贴特性探讨[J];上海政法学院学报;2005年05期
9 ;[J];;年期
中国硕士学位论文全文数据库 前1条
1 周芳;诉讼上抵销抗辩研究[D];西南政法大学;2012年
，本文编号：2136115
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2136115.html
