法律逻辑的再思考——基于“论证逻辑”的研究视角
发布时间：2018-07-27 11:25
【摘要】：形式主义法学的历史困局误读剥离了法律与逻辑的天然联系,然而机械的演绎逻辑观忽视了法律的开放属性,法律逻辑需要一种动态和发展的逻辑观。"论证逻辑"是一种天然的法律逻辑,它善于理解并表达法律的理性特质,包括法律推理的可废止性、法律论证的论辩属性和法律对话的程序理性等。不同于基于后承关系的逻辑,"论证逻辑"实质上是一类关于非形式逻辑和形式论证理论的概括性统称。它的目的是为法律论证实践提供一种分析、比较和评估论证的综合方法,从而在证成司法证明和规范法律程序等方面发挥作用。
[Abstract]:The historical dilemma of formalism law misreads the natural connection between law and logic, but the mechanical deductive logic ignores the open nature of law, and legal logic needs a kind of dynamic and developing logic view. " Argumentation logic "is a kind of natural legal logic, which is good at understanding and expressing the rational characteristics of law, including the abrogation of legal reasoning, the argumentation attribute of legal argumentation and the procedural rationality of legal dialogue." Different from the logic based on the posteriori relation, the argumentation logic is essentially a general term about the informal logic and formal argumentation theory. Its purpose is to provide a comprehensive method of analysis, comparison and evaluation for the practice of legal argumentation, so as to play a role in the judicial proof and the standardization of legal procedures.
【作者单位】： 西南政法大学行政法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(15YJCZH182) 重庆市教委科技项目(KJ1500103) 西南政法大学校级科研项目(2014XZQN-30)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D90-051
本文编号：2147666
[Abstract]:The historical dilemma of formalism law misreads the natural connection between law and logic, but the mechanical deductive logic ignores the open nature of law, and legal logic needs a kind of dynamic and developing logic view. " Argumentation logic "is a kind of natural legal logic, which is good at understanding and expressing the rational characteristics of law, including the abrogation of legal reasoning, the argumentation attribute of legal argumentation and the procedural rationality of legal dialogue." Different from the logic based on the posteriori relation, the argumentation logic is essentially a general term about the informal logic and formal argumentation theory. Its purpose is to provide a comprehensive method of analysis, comparison and evaluation for the practice of legal argumentation, so as to play a role in the judicial proof and the standardization of legal procedures.
【作者单位】： 西南政法大学行政法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(15YJCZH182) 重庆市教委科技项目(KJ1500103) 西南政法大学校级科研项目(2014XZQN-30)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D90-051
【相似文献】
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 杜晓;应对键盘侠靠道德如擀面杖吹火[N];法制日报;2014年
，本文编号：2147666
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2147666.html
