当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 法理论文 >

“社会法法域说”证成——大陆法系和英美法系融合的一个例证

发布时间:2018-07-31 12:04
【摘要】:第三法域理论在大陆法系的发展呈现倒退或停滞之势,对该理论我国社会法学界亦众说纷纭,使得部门法体系划分和法律实践缺乏科学系统的理论指导。英关法系的政府管制理论和实践与大陆法系法律社会化理论和实践兴起在相同的历史时空下,但前者的理论基础和范畴比后者更显宽厚和清晰,其社科法学研究方法更富有活力。"社会法法域说"质疑者所顾虑的主要是私法公法化、公法私法化与社会法之间的界限难以划分,或者陷入公法、私法的形式理性而排斥新法域的形成。其实,借鉴政府管制法律制度和原理可以解答这些质疑并证成"社会法法域说"。社会法个性鲜明,是有关弱势群体生存、宏观经济安全、市场秩序、公序良俗以及生态环境保障的且不属于传统私法和传统公法所界定的研究范围的法律规范的总和领域。
[Abstract]:The third jurisdiction theory shows the tendency of retrogression or stagnation in the development of the continental law system, and there are different opinions on the theory, which makes the division of the department law system and the legal practice lack of the theoretical guidance of the scientific system. The theory and practice of government regulation in the Anglo-Chinese law system are rising in the same historical time and space as the theory and practice of the socialization of law in the civil law system, but the theoretical basis and scope of the former are more generous and clear than those of the latter. Its social science law research method is more vigorous. " The main concern of the skeptics is the private law, the boundary between the public law and the social law is difficult to be divided, or they fall into the public law, the form of private law is rational and the formation of the new legal field is excluded. In fact, drawing lessons from the legal system and principles of government regulation can answer these questions and prove to be "the theory of social jurisdiction". Social law has a distinct personality and is the summation of legal norms related to the survival of vulnerable groups, macroeconomic security, market order, public order and good customs, as well as ecological environmental protection, which are not defined by traditional private law and traditional public law.
【作者单位】: 浙江财经大学法学院;
【基金】:教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目《劳动管制现状与法治化实证研究》(15YJA820023) 国家社科基金重大招标项目《创新中国特色劳动关系协调机制研究》(15ZDA049)的成果
【分类号】:D904;D912.1

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 邓伟志;社会学与社会法[J];法治论丛;2002年06期

2 郑尚元;社会法的存在与社会法理论探索[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2003年03期

3 竺效;关于“社会法”概念探讨之探讨[J];浙江学刊;2004年01期

4 竺效;“社会法”概念考析——兼议我国学术界关于社会法语词之使用[J];法律适用;2004年03期

5 郑尚元;社会法的特有属性与范畴[J];法学;2004年05期

6 李蕊;丛晓峰;;历史视角下的社会法范畴[J];北京科技大学学报(社会科学版);2007年02期

7 姜登峰;;“社会法”概念的基本分析[J];佳木斯大学社会科学学报;2007年04期

8 林嘉;;社会法在构建和谐社会中的使命[J];法学家;2007年02期

9 李炳安;;社会法范畴初论[J];福建政法管理干部学院学报;2007年03期

10 马召伟;王爱民;;社会法体系的探讨[J];塔里木大学学报;2007年04期

相关会议论文 前3条

1 朱晓U,

本文编号:2155534


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2155534.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户4f212***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com