拟制问题研究
发布时间：2018-08-01 17:08
【摘要】：法律拟制作为一个古老的法哲学问题，虽然现阶段研究较少，但是仍发挥着较大的功用。本文主要对法律拟制的概念、本质、形成以及价值等基本问题进行了介绍。指出法律拟制是基于社会价值因素的考量以及法律的限制，将两件不具有逻辑常态联系的情事赋予相同法效果的虚构性陈述。此外，，本文论述的重点是从法律拟制的其中一种分类，即立法拟制和司法拟制两方面进行的，阐明立法拟制发挥的是“规则创造”的功能，而司法拟制发挥的是“法律续造”的功能。通过对国内外学者对该问题的研究成果，最终试图说明，在现阶段的中国能否适用立法拟制以及司法拟制，以及在适用时该如何进行限制的问题。
[Abstract]:As an old legal philosophy problem, the legal system of legal system is still exerting a great function, although it is less studied at the present stage. This article mainly introduces the basic problems of the concept, essence, formation and value of legal system. It points out that the legal system is based on the consideration of social value and the limitation of the law, and two pieces are not available. In addition, the emphasis of this article is from two aspects of the classification of legal system, namely, legislative drafting and judicial drafting, and clarifying that the legislative drafting is the function of "rule creation", and the judicial preparation is the function of "law continuation". Through the research results of scholars at home and abroad on this issue, the final attempt to explain whether China can apply legislative drafting and judicial drafting at the present stage and how to limit it when applied.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D90
本文编号：2158259
[Abstract]:As an old legal philosophy problem, the legal system of legal system is still exerting a great function, although it is less studied at the present stage. This article mainly introduces the basic problems of the concept, essence, formation and value of legal system. It points out that the legal system is based on the consideration of social value and the limitation of the law, and two pieces are not available. In addition, the emphasis of this article is from two aspects of the classification of legal system, namely, legislative drafting and judicial drafting, and clarifying that the legislative drafting is the function of "rule creation", and the judicial preparation is the function of "law continuation". Through the research results of scholars at home and abroad on this issue, the final attempt to explain whether China can apply legislative drafting and judicial drafting at the present stage and how to limit it when applied.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D90
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 温晓莉;;论法律虚拟与法律拟制之区别——法哲学的时代变革[J];北大法律评论;2007年01期
2 王军仁;;我国民法中的法律拟制与注意规定[J];东方论坛.青岛大学学报;2006年02期
3 陈金钊;法律解释及其基本特征[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2000年06期
4 杨奕华;;论法律虚拟与法学研究[J];法律方法与法律思维;2002年00期
5 卢鹏;;罗马法拟制思维与现代知识产权制度建构[J];华南理工大学学报(社会科学版);2011年05期
6 邵栋豪;;法律拟制及其刑法视域的中国检讨[J];刑法论丛;2009年01期
7 卢鹏;论结论性推定与拟制的区别[J];同济大学学报(社会科学版);2003年01期
8 刘风景;;“视为”的法理与创制[J];中外法学;2010年02期
9 蔡琳;;合宪性解释及其解释规则——兼与张翔博士商榷[J];浙江社会科学;2009年10期
本文编号：2158259
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2158259.html
