美国反倾销日落复审机制研究

发布时间：2018-01-16 14:29

本文关键词：美国反倾销日落复审机制研究　出处：《中国政法大学》2009年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 日落复审作为反倾销调查的一项后续程序,其设立目的是为了在反倾销措施实施一段时间之后,审查继续实施反倾销措施的合理性和必要性。因此,日落复审的结果关系到已经实施的反倾销措施能否如期终止。美国是世界上反倾销日落复审机制较为完善的国家之一,同时也是世界上对华反倾销最多的国家之一。因此,研究其反倾销日落复审制度,对在该国市场饱受反倾销措施之苦的我国生产商和出口商具有重要意义。目前,国内对反倾销的研究已经比较深入,但专门针对反倾销中日落复审问题的研究还很少。本文从美国反倾销日落复审制度的演进和确立入手,主要分析美国商务部和国际贸易委员会在日落复审程序中,作出可能性裁定时需遵循的实体规则。通过该分析,以期对我国反倾销日落复审制度的完善以及主管机关的实践有所帮助。在结构上,本文分为前言、正文和结论三个部分。其中,作为文章主体的正文部分,又分为四章。前言部分交代了选题的背景、意义和写作目的。第一章美国反倾销日落复审制度概述,是对美国该制度的总体介绍。本章首先简单介绍WTO的日落复审制度,通过回顾日落复审条款的演进历程,阐明了该条款的目的和宗旨。然后对美国现有的反倾销成文法和法规进行概括,厘清其反倾销日落复审法律体系。第二章美国反倾销日落复审实体规则研究,是本文的重点。该章结合以美国为被申诉方的三起案件的WTO上诉机构报告,分美国商务部和国际贸易委员会两条主线,分别分析了两主管机关在日落复审程序中作出可能性裁定时需要遵循的实体规则以及在实践中如何运用这些规则,主要是裁定的考虑因素以及考虑“其他因素”的条件。本章对两主管机关在日落复审中一些有争议的规定和做法进行重点分析,包括倾销幅度的确定、国内产业的脆弱性、累积评估在日落复审程序中适用的合理性等。第三章对美国反倾销日落复审可能性裁定的救济。本章指出了对不合理的可能性裁定可以采取的救济手段,可以到国际贸易法院进行起诉,请求司法审查,也可以直接诉诸WTO争端解决机制。利害关系方也可以同时采用两种手段。第四章中国反倾销日落复审制度的完善。本章首先对我国现有的关于日落复审的规定进行梳理,并介绍了我国对外的第一起日落复审案,从而得出我国现有日落复审制度的不足——缺乏具体的有法律效力的法律规则的指导,在对外效力上存在缺陷。通过前文对美国日落复审制度的分析,本文借鉴其成熟经验及立法技巧,对我国日落复审制度的完善提出四点建议。结论部分对本文观点进行总结。一方面肯定了美国日落复审制度完善的体系和完备的内容,另一方面也指出该制度所具有的贸易保护主义色彩。因此,在借鉴该制度时要取其精华、弃其糟粕,学习其先进的立法技巧,吸纳其合理的规定,而不能盲目崇拜,照抄照搬。
[Abstract]:A follow-up program as the sunset review of anti-dumping investigation, the purpose of its establishment is to implement a period of time in the anti-dumping measures, rationality and necessity continue to review the implementation of the anti-dumping measures. Therefore, the relationship between the sunset review results to the implementation of the anti-dumping measures will expire on schedule.
The United States is one of the sunset review mechanism is perfect anti dumping law in the world, is also one of the world's anti-dumping in most countries. Therefore, the study of anti-dumping sunset review system, has important significance for suffering from anti-dumping measures from the market in the country of China's manufacturers and exporters. At present, the domestic study on anti dumping has been more in-depth, but specifically for the study of anti-dumping sunset review are rare.
In this paper, the evolution from the United States anti-dumping sunset review system and the establishment of the main analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce and International Trade Commission in the sunset review procedures, make the possibility of ruling substantive rules should follow. Through the analysis, in order to improve China's anti dumping review system and the practice of competent authorities for help.
In structure, this article is divided into three parts: preface, text and conclusion, which are divided into four chapters as the body part of the main body of the article.
The preface explains the background, significance and purpose of the topic.
The first chapter outlines the United States anti-dumping sunset review system, the system of the United States is a general introduction. This chapter firstly introduces WTO's sunset review system, through reviewing the evolution course of the sunset clause, to clarify the terms of aim and purpose. Then the existing U.S. antidumping statutes and regulations are summarized, clarify the sunset review of anti dumping legal system.
The second chapter of the United States anti-dumping sunset review rules of the entity, is the focus of this paper. This chapter combined with the United States to report the WTO appellate body by three cases in which the complainant, the United States Department of Commerce and international trade commission two lines are analyzed respectively. Two the authorities in the sunset review procedures to make substantive rules to follow the possibility of ruling and in practice how to use these rules, the main factor is that, considering the "other factors". This chapter of the two authorities of some controversial provisions and practices in the sunset review focuses on the analysis, including the determination of dumping margin, the vulnerability of the domestic industry, the cumulative assessment application in the sunset review procedures of rationality.
The third chapter on the possibility of relief ruled the United States anti-dumping sunset review. This chapter points out that can be taken to remedy the possibility of unreasonable, can be prosecuted to the court of international trade, a request for judicial review, can also go directly to the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. An interested party can use two kinds of means.
The fourth chapter is the improvement Chinese anti-dumping sunset review system. The first chapter of the provisions on the sunset review of the current review, and introduces China's first sunset review, so as to get the guidance of China's existing sunset review system of the deficiency of the lack of specific legal rules, legal effect, existence the defects in the external effect. Through the analysis of the sunset review system, referring to the mature experience and legislative techniques, puts forward four suggestions on Perfecting China's sunset review system.
The conclusion part summarizes this view. On the one hand that the sunset review system to improve the system and complete the contents, on the other hand also pointed out that trade protectionism is the system. Therefore, in reference to the system to take the essence and discard the dross, learn the advanced legislative skills, absorb the reasonable regulations, but not blindly worship, copy.

【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：DD912.29;D971.2

【参考文献】