西方比较法学研究范式的后现代转向及其限度

发布时间：2018-04-09 04:12

本文选题：后现代主义　切入点：功能主义　出处：《学术月刊》2013年03期

【摘要】：20世纪90年代,西方比较法学中兴起了一股后现代思潮,它对主流范式展开批判,并提出两类替代性方案——"文化性法律比较"和"批判性法律比较",试图推动比较法学的研究范式发生一次转型。这主要包括两方面:方法上,主张从偏好"共性"转向强调"特殊性";目标上,要求舍弃比较法学的规范性面向,从实践转向认知。从学科的发展逻辑看,这个转向是为了将比较法学确立为一门"纯粹的科学",而将其固有的反形式主义进路推向极致后产生的一种必然结果。效果上,它为比较法学打开了一个独特的视角,促使人们对确立已久的研究假设、方法和模式进行审视和反思。然而,由于在方法论上存在致命缺陷,它最终未能推动比较法学发生真正的变革,反而加剧了该学科固有的理论与实践之间的分裂,使其陷入一场前所未有的危机。
[Abstract]:In the 1990s, a postmodern trend of thought rose in western comparative law, which criticized the mainstream paradigm.Two kinds of alternative schemes, "cultural legal comparison" and "critical legal comparison", are put forward in order to promote a transformation of the research paradigm of comparative jurisprudence.This mainly includes two aspects: method, from preference "commonality" to "particularity", and goal, from the normative aspect of comparative law to the cognition from practice.From the logic of discipline development, this turn is an inevitable result of establishing comparative jurisprudence as a "pure science" and pushing its inherent anti-formalism to the extreme.In effect, it opens up a unique angle of view for comparative jurisprudence, and urges people to examine and reflect on the long-established research hypotheses, methods and models.However, because of the fatal defect in methodology, it failed to promote the real change of comparative law, on the contrary, it aggravated the division between the theory and practice of this discipline and plunged it into an unprecedented crisis.
【作者单位】：上海社会科学院政治与公共管理研究所;
【分类号】：D908

【共引文献】