司法强拆的法律修辞学解读

发布时间：2018-04-23 01:39

本文选题：法律修辞 + 司法强拆　；参考：《山西师大学报(社会科学版)》2012年06期

【摘要】：法律修辞学的核心在于其"听众理论"。"司法强拆"作为一种从司法到立法的全方位的法律修辞,其听众有以下三类:(1)普遍听众,即为社会大众。(2)单一听众,即具体案件当中的当事人。(3)说理者本身,即国家行政机关。而作为法律修辞的"司法强拆"的立法旨趣仅仅在于通过对三种听众进行分化,争取大多数的与具体案情没有直接关系的社会大众,在现有框架下尽量保证部分听众之间的局部矛盾不会轻而易举的膨胀并发酵为其他矛盾。这种修辞存在概念的不稳定性、价值初衷的功利性、实践的颠覆性等三方面实务操作困境,但即便如此,"司法强拆"依然存在增量意义。
[Abstract]:The core of legal rhetoric lies in its audience theory. As a kind of omnidirectional legal rhetoric from judicature to legislation, the audience of judicial forced demolition is as follows: 1) the general audience, that is, the social mass, the single audience, that is, the litigant in the concrete case, the reasoning person himself, that is, the state administrative organ. The legislative purport of "judicial demolition" as legal rhetoric is only to divide the three kinds of listeners and win over the majority of the public who are not directly related to the specific circumstances of the case. Under the existing framework, try to ensure that local conflicts between some listeners do not expand easily and grow into other contradictions. There are three practical difficulties in this kind of rhetoric, such as the instability of concept, the utilitarianism of the original intention of value and the subversive nature of practice, but even so, there is still incremental significance in "judicial demolition".
【作者单位】：重庆工商大学法学院;
【分类号】：D90-55

【共引文献】