厦门Q币案的分析与思考

发布时间：2018-05-20 21:16

本文选题：Q币 + 虚拟财产　；参考：《兰州大学》2009年硕士论文

【摘要】： 进入新世纪以来,网络犯罪案件层出不穷,尤其以网络虚拟财产犯罪案件最为常见,预防和惩治网络虚拟财产犯罪成为迫切的现实需求。然而,目前我国立法对网络虚拟财产犯罪的规制缺乏足够的法律依据。本文选取网络虚拟财产犯罪案件中比较典型的厦门Q币案为例,理论联系实际,通过分析案件反映出的问题来论述当前我国法律在此方面存在的缺陷,并借鉴发达国家和地区先进的网络立法经验,结合中国实际情况,提出一些法律建议,以促进中国网络法制化进程。本文写作分为以下几个部分: 首先,通过对厦门Q币案案情和争议焦点的介绍,引出虚拟财产法律地位及价值认定,侵犯虚拟财产犯罪案件如何定罪,电子证据法律地位等问题,介绍法检双方以及社会各界在这些问题上的观点与分歧。其次,对厦门Q币案进行全面的法律分析,对争议的焦点问题进行辨析,提出虚拟财产应当属于受刑法保护的财产,虚拟财产权应当是一种兼具物权属性和债权属性的新型财产权的观点,并对本案等侵犯网络虚拟财产犯罪涉案数额的认定提出自己的看法;在综合比较分析电子证据有关学说的基础上,论述电子证据在本案等侵犯网络虚拟财产犯罪案件中的法律地位,对本案的定罪量刑提出自己的看法。最后,对案件进行反思,总结案件反应出的问题,提出一些立法建议。包括应当立法的几个方面,应遵循什么样的立法模式和基本要求,并提出在目前法律对相关问题还没有明确规定的情况下,为维护罪刑法定和统一司法实践的权宜之计。侵犯网络虚拟财产类犯罪案件本身争议就很大,许多问题至今没有定论,本文的撰写意在引起社会全面、客观的认识网络虚拟财产犯罪的复杂性,沟通理论和实务,统一裁判标准,完善立法和提高司法功效,增强防控网络虚拟财产犯罪的能力。
[Abstract]:Since entering the new century, the network crime cases emerge in endlessly, especially in the network virtual property crime cases are the most common, the prevention and punishment of the network virtual property crime has become an urgent practical need. However, the legislation of our country lacks sufficient legal basis to regulate the crime of network virtual property. This paper takes Xiamen Q coin case, which is a typical crime case of virtual property on the network, as an example, combines theory with practice, and discusses the defects of current Chinese law in this respect by analyzing the problems reflected in the case. Based on the advanced network legislation experience of developed countries and regions and the actual situation in China, some legal suggestions are put forward in order to promote the process of network legalization in China. This paper is divided into the following parts: First of all, through the introduction of the case of Q coin in Xiamen and the focus of the dispute, the legal status and value determination of virtual property, how to convict the crime case of infringing virtual property, the legal status of electronic evidence, etc. This paper introduces the views and differences on these issues between the two parties and the community. Secondly, it makes a comprehensive legal analysis of Q coin case in Xiamen, differentiates the focus of the dispute, and puts forward that the virtual property should belong to the property protected by criminal law. The virtual property right should be a new property right with the property of real right and the attribute of creditor's rights, and put forward its own opinion on the confirmation of the amount involved in the crime of infringing on the network virtual property, such as this case. On the basis of comprehensive comparison and analysis of relevant theories of electronic evidence, this paper discusses the legal status of electronic evidence in the case of network virtual property crime, and puts forward its own views on the conviction and sentencing of this case. Finally, reflect on the case, summarize the problems reflected in the case, and put forward some legislative suggestions. It includes several aspects of legislation, what kind of legislative model and basic requirements should be followed, and puts forward some expedient measures for maintaining the punishment of crime and unifying judicial practice under the circumstances that there are no clear provisions on the relevant issues in the present law. The crime case of infringing the network virtual property itself is very controversial, many problems have not yet been decided, the writing of this article is intended to cause the society to comprehensively and objectively understand the complexity of the crime of network virtual property, and communicate the theory and practice. Unify the judgment standard, perfect the legislation and improve the judicial effect, strengthen the ability of preventing and controlling the crime of the network virtual property.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D920.5

【参考文献】