跨境破产管辖权冲突及其协调问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-20 21:39

本文选题：跨境破产 + 管辖权冲突　；参考：《华东政法大学》2009年硕士论文

【摘要】： 目前国际上尚无处理跨境破产的法律框架,而跨境破产又通常涉及一国的基本法律原则和重大经济利益,因此,在这一领域,法律冲突特别突出。随着我国经济日益融入世界经济,不可避免地面临越来越多的跨境破产案件,受到的影响也不断增大。但是,我国国内法学界对跨境破产法律制度的研究起步较晚,研究成果大多集中于跨境破产的域外效力和法律适用,较少触及管辖权方面,现行立法对此规定也不尽完善,司法实践面临许多困难。然而,管辖权在跨境破产中处于十分特殊的地位,管辖权的确定往往决定了准据法的适用,将对案件当事人的实体权利产生直接影响,并且关系到判决的承认和执行。为此,各国对跨境破产案件管辖权的争夺格外激烈,并试图适用不同的管辖权确定标准来扩张本国的管辖权。所以,本文拟对跨境破产管辖权冲突问题进行深入分析,并积极寻求合理的协调方式。正文共分为三章: 第一章对跨境破产管辖权冲突的基本问题进行概述。首先,从跨境破产管辖权的概念和特点入手,说明其在跨境破产中的重要性。其次,详细评析了各种跨境破产管辖权确定标准的实际适用情况,并在此基础上,揭示了跨境破产管辖权冲突的现实性和形成原因。第二章重点研究跨境破产管辖权冲突的协调问题。首先,阐述了协调跨境破产管辖权冲突的两个原则:利益平衡和国际合作。其次,探讨了协调与缓解跨境破产管辖权冲突的三种主要途径。最后,对以美国《破产法》、《欧盟破产程序规则》和联合国《跨境破产示范法》为代表的跨境破产管辖权冲突的协调模式进行了具体分析。第三章是关于我国协调跨境破产管辖权冲突的思考。在分析我国协调跨境破产管辖权冲突的立法现状和司法实践的基础上,结合其他国家或国际组织的有益经验,提出相关的立法建议。
[Abstract]:At present, there is no legal framework to deal with cross-border bankruptcy in the world, and cross-border bankruptcy usually involves the basic legal principles and major economic interests of a country. Therefore, conflicts of laws are particularly prominent in this field. As China's economy is increasingly integrated into the world economy, it inevitably faces more and more cross-border bankruptcy cases, and the impact is increasing. However, the research on cross-border bankruptcy legal system in domestic legal circles started relatively late. Most of the research results focused on the extraterritorial effects and legal application of cross-border bankruptcy, less touched on jurisdiction, and the current legislation is not perfect. Judicial practice faces many difficulties. However, jurisdiction is in a very special position in cross-border bankruptcy. The determination of jurisdiction often determines the application of applicable law, which will have a direct impact on the substantive rights of the parties to the case, and it is also related to the recognition and enforcement of judgments. Therefore, the competition for jurisdiction over cross-border bankruptcy cases is particularly fierce, and attempts to apply different jurisdiction determination criteria to expand their jurisdiction. Therefore, this paper intends to analyze the conflict of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction, and actively seek a reasonable way of coordination. The text is divided into three chapters: The first chapter summarizes the basic problems of the conflict of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction. First of all, from the concept and characteristics of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction, explains its importance in cross-border bankruptcy. Secondly, the paper makes a detailed analysis of the practical application of various cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction determination criteria, and on this basis, reveals the reality of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction conflict and the reasons for its formation. The second chapter focuses on the coordination of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction conflicts. Firstly, two principles to coordinate the conflict of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction are expounded: balance of interests and international cooperation. Secondly, three main ways to coordinate and mitigate the conflict of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction are discussed. Finally, the coordination model of the conflict of jurisdiction in cross-border insolvency, represented by the bankruptcy Law of the United States, the rules of bankruptcy procedure of the European Union and the United Nations Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency, is analyzed in detail. The third chapter is about the coordination of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction conflicts in China. On the basis of analyzing the current situation of legislation and judicial practice of coordinating the conflict of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction in our country, and combining the beneficial experience of other countries or international organizations, this paper puts forward some relevant legislative suggestions.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D99;D971.2

【参考文献】