美国反补贴调查中的“紧急情势”法律问题研究
发布时间:2018-06-08 23:57
本文选题:《SCM协定》 + 美国反补贴 ; 参考:《湖南师范大学》2010年硕士论文
【摘要】: 近年来,随着世界经济的发展,我国进出口总额大幅增长,成为全球的贸易大国。但与此同时我国也已成为发达国家采取贸易救济措施的主要目标。截至2010年4月,我国已连续4年成为全球遭受反补贴调查最多的国家,这其中以美国对我国提起的反补贴调查为最多。自2006年美国首次对来自中国铜版纸产品发起反补反贴调查以来,到目前为止美国共对我国发起的反补贴调查高达25起。特别是受金融危机的影响,仅2009年美国就对我国发起了10起反补贴调查。这已对我国的出口和就业造成了严重的影响。因此,为保护中国出口企业的合法权益,以及维护贸易公平,必须加强对美国反补贴调查的研究。而作为美国反补贴调查中的具体问题之一,紧急情势将直接关系到是否对初裁做出前90天内的进口产品进行追溯性征收反补贴税与否,其重要性可见一斑。为更好地认识这一问题,从法律规定和实践层面加强对其的研究与探讨就尤为必要。这也将更好地维护我国的合法权益以及更好地应对美国的反补贴调查。 为此,首先主要应介绍美国对紧急情势的法律规定、调查机关以及调查程序等,以使读者对于紧急情势有一个初步的了解。其次,应着重通过美国调查机关对紧急情势的调查实践,从中获取调查机关对有关该问题法律规定的诠释,以及当法律对该问题未规定或规定模糊时调查机关的习惯做法。再次,应对美国针对该问题的立法与调查实践进行评价,以探讨出其的可取之处和不足之处。最后,依照前文的论述以对我国的立法以及应诉企业提供借鉴意义。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the development of the world economy, China's import and export volume has increased significantly, and China has become a major trading country in the world. But at the same time, China has also become the main target of the developed countries to take trade relief measures. Up to April 2010, China has been the country that suffered the most countervailing investigation for 4 consecutive years in the world, among which, the United States initiated the most countervailing investigation on our country. Since 2006, when the United States launched the first countervailing investigation on China's coated paper products, up to now, the United States has launched a total of 25 countervailing investigations against China. Especially under the influence of the financial crisis, the United States launched 10 anti-subsidy investigations in 2009 alone. This has had a serious impact on China's exports and employment. Therefore, in order to protect the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese export enterprises and safeguard trade fairness, we must strengthen the research on American countervailing investigation. As one of the specific problems in the United States countervailing investigation, the emergency situation will be directly related to whether or not to retroactively impose countervailing duty on the imported products within 90 days before the initial adjudication, and its importance can be seen. In order to better understand this problem, it is necessary to strengthen its research and exploration from the aspects of law and practice. This will also better safeguard China's legitimate rights and interests and better deal with countervailing investigations in the United States. To this end, first of all, it should mainly introduce the legal provisions of the United States on emergency situations, the investigative agencies and the investigation procedures, and so on. In order to give readers a preliminary understanding of the emergency situation. Secondly, we should focus on the investigation practice of the United States investigative agencies on emergency situations, from which we can obtain the interpretation of the legal provisions on this issue by the investigating organs, and the customary practices of the investigation agencies when the laws do not provide for the issue or when the provisions are vague. Thirdly, it is necessary to evaluate the legislation and investigation practice in order to find out its merits and shortcomings. Finally, according to the previous discussion to provide reference to our legislation and the responding enterprises.
【学位授予单位】:湖南师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:D971.2;DD912.29
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 袁古洁;WTO《SCM协议》与我国反补贴法律体系的发展[J];华南师范大学学报(社会科学版);2003年04期
2 欧福永,熊之才;WTO《SCM协议》下补贴问题法律对策研究[J];中国法学;2001年04期
3 李学稳;国际贸易中的反补贴趋势与我国反补贴制度的完善[J];现代财经-天津财经学院学报;2003年05期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 尹德永;WTO补贴反补贴实体规则研究[D];中国政法大学;2004年
2 毛骁骁;WTO框架下的中国国企补贴法律问题研究[D];复旦大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 周荣新;论WTO中的补贴概念[D];中国政法大学;2004年
2 卢荣蕾;世贸框架下我国补贴与反补贴问题法律对策探讨[D];中国政法大学;2003年
3 周艳;对非市场经济国家适用反补贴的法律思考[D];北京大学;2008年
4 同晓芬;美国反补贴法的修改及中国的法律应对[D];西北大学;2008年
,本文编号:1997816
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/1997816.html

