对一起借款合同纠纷案的法律分析

发布时间：2018-06-14 20:51

本文选题：借款合同 + 流质条款　；参考：《兰州大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】： 随着我国经济社会的快速发展,借款合同在民间广泛存在。由此引发的诉讼也越来越多,并且其中还掺杂了其他的法律关系。这使借款合同纠纷表现出主体的多元化以及法律关系的复杂化倾向。本文以一个案例作为引子,对该案例中呈现出的法律问题做了一定研究。本文主体部分遵循“提出问题—分析问题—解决问题”的基本思路,分四大部分展开论述。第一部分是案情介绍。文章选取湖南省醴陵市人民法院的一个案例作为研究对象。对案件的案由,审理情况及判决结果,一一进行了介绍。并提出该案例涉及的主要法律问题。第二部分是就本案中的民间借贷合同的性质展开分析。首先是分析民间借贷合同的一般性特征,然后对本案进行具体的分析。认为本案中的借款合同是典型的民间借贷合同。第三部分是对本案中流质抵押条款的定性。首先是分析流质条款的特征及国内外的现状,然后结合本案,认为本案中被告吴晓静同意以自有房产转户行为是一种流质抵押行为,是违法的。第四部分是展开论述本案被告苏传军是否应对全部债务承担连带责任。关于这个问题,本文对法院判决被告苏传军承担连带责任提出质疑,并结合有关婚姻家庭法上有关连带责任的认定,得出本案被告苏传军不具备对该债务的全部承担连带责任的条件。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of our country's economy and society, the loan contract exists widely in the people. More and more lawsuits have been brought, and other legal relationships have been mixed. This makes the dispute of loan contract show the diversification of the subject and the complicating tendency of the legal relationship. In this paper, a case as the introduction, the case presented in the legal issues made a certain study. The main part of this paper follows the basic idea of "posing problem-analyzing problem-solving problem" and discusses it in four parts. The first part is the presentation of the case. This paper chooses a case of Liling City people's Court in Hunan Province as the object of study. The case of the case, the trial situation and the result of the judgment, one by one, introduced. The main legal issues involved in the case are also put forward. The second part is the analysis of the nature of the private loan contract in this case. The first is to analyze the general characteristics of private lending contracts, and then to carry out a specific analysis of the case. It is believed that the loan contract in this case is a typical private loan contract. The third part is the characterization of the liquid mortgage clause in this case. Firstly, it analyzes the characteristics of the liquid property clause and the current situation at home and abroad, and then considers that the defendant Wu Xiaojing agrees in this case that it is a liquid mortgage act and illegal. The fourth part is to discuss whether the defendant Su Chuanjun should bear joint liability for all debts. On this issue, this paper challenges the court's judgment that the defendant Su Chuanjun is jointly and severally liable, and combines with the determination of joint and several liability in the relevant marriage and family law. It was concluded that the defendant Su Chuanjun did not meet the conditions for joint and several liability for the debt.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D920.5

【参考文献】