甘肃“对赌协议案”判决之评析——以法律方法的运用为视角

发布时间：2018-06-15 02:30

本文选题：对赌协议案 + 利益衡量　；参考：《法学论坛》2015年01期

【摘要】：疑难案件是各种法律方法尤其是非常规法律方法运用的主要场域。甘肃"对赌协议案"作为新型疑难案件,兼具事实定性困难和冲突型法律选择困难。对赌协议条款属新型无名合同条款,欲解决其定性难题须综合运用多种合同解释方法。该案中涉及的民间法与国家法、民间法与其他社会规范间的冲突是两种不同法律体系之间的法律冲突,其冲突的消解无法借助于效力识别方法,只能仰仗于利益衡量方法。运用利益衡量方法消解以上冲突的具体规则是:(1)合同等民间法优于国家法或其他社会规范的任意性规定;(2)国家法或其他社会规范的强行性规定优于合同等民间法;(3)合同等民间法的有效推定规则。正确并妥当地解释该案涉及的国家法和其他社会规范的相关强行性规定的含义是运用利益衡量方法消解以上冲突的前提和基础。
[Abstract]:Difficult cases are the main field of application of various legal methods, especially unconventional legal methods. As a new type of difficult case, Gansu's gambling agreement case has both the difficulty of qualitative analysis of facts and the difficulty of choosing conflict law. The gambling agreement clause is a new type of nameless contract clause. To solve its qualitative problem, a variety of contract interpretation methods must be used. The conflict between civil law and national law, the conflict between civil law and other social norms is a legal conflict between two different legal systems. The specific rule of using the method of interest measurement to resolve the above conflicts is: 1) the arbitrary provisions of contract and other social norms are superior to those of the state law or other social norms. (2) the compulsory provisions of the state law or other social norms are superior to those of the civil law such as contracts. Contract and other effective presumption rules of folk law. A correct and proper interpretation of the meaning of the relevant mandatory provisions of the national law and other social norms involved in the case is the premise and basis for resolving the above conflicts by means of the method of interest measurement.
【作者单位】：中南大学法学院;
【分类号】：D920.5;D923

【相似文献】