美国专利司法强制许可实践及对我国的启示
发布时间：2018-08-01 17:01
【摘要】：专利强制许可制度是平衡专利权人利益与社会公共利益的重要手段。但是,我国现行专利行政强制许可制度建立20多年来仍然是"零实施",探寻其他有效途径解决专利保护与公共利益冲突势在必行。多年来,美国司法机关在处理专利侵权纠纷中实施的司法强制许可,为我们提供了可资借鉴的办法。在严格规范适用条件的前提下,通过拒绝适用停止侵害的做法,适当推行专利司法强制许可,可以弥补现行行政强制许可的不足,更好地维护公共利益需要。
[Abstract]:Compulsory patent licensing system is an important means to balance the interests of patentees and public interests. However, since the establishment of the patent administrative compulsory license system in China for more than 20 years, it is imperative to explore other effective ways to solve the conflict between patent protection and public interest. For many years, the judicial compulsory license implemented by American judicial organs in dealing with patent infringement disputes has provided us with a method for reference. Under the premise of strictly standardizing the applicable conditions, by refusing to apply the method of stopping infringement and properly carrying out the patent judicial compulsory license, we can make up for the deficiency of the current administrative compulsory license and better safeguard the need of public interest.
【作者单位】： 广东外语外贸大学法学院;
【基金】：广东省哲学社会科学“十一五规划”项目(GD10XFX02)
【分类号】：D971.2;D923.42
[Abstract]:Compulsory patent licensing system is an important means to balance the interests of patentees and public interests. However, since the establishment of the patent administrative compulsory license system in China for more than 20 years, it is imperative to explore other effective ways to solve the conflict between patent protection and public interest. For many years, the judicial compulsory license implemented by American judicial organs in dealing with patent infringement disputes has provided us with a method for reference. Under the premise of strictly standardizing the applicable conditions, by refusing to apply the method of stopping infringement and properly carrying out the patent judicial compulsory license, we can make up for the deficiency of the current administrative compulsory license and better safeguard the need of public interest.
【作者单位】： 广东外语外贸大学法学院;
【基金】：广东省哲学社会科学“十一五规划”项目(GD10XFX02)
【分类号】：D971.2;D923.42
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈慰星;;奥运会口号的知识产权保护研究[J];首都体育学院学报;2005年06期
2 刘亚军;马乐;;国际特许经营中商标独占使用权保护的困境与选择——由一起商标商品平行进口案例引发的思考[J];当代法学;2006年04期
3 王迁;;论版权“间接侵权”及其规则的法定化[J];法学;2005年12期
4 孙玉红;;论知识产权侵权归责原则[J];河北法学;2006年02期
5 杨志祥;;论知识产权侵权行为的无过错责任归责原则[J];邵阳学院学报(社会科学版);2006年05期
6 原晓爽;专利侵权行为的经济分析[J];太原理工大学学报(社会科学版);2004年04期
7 黄磊;海峡两岸商标权刑法保护的比较研究[J];温州大学学报;2005年03期
8 魏振瀛;;《民法通则》规定的民事责任——从物权法到民法典的规定[J];现代法学;2006年03期
9 张玉敏,凌潇;论知识产权的刑法保护[J];西南民族大学学报(人文社科版);2005年08期
10 孙玉红;;知识产权侵权责任的构成要件新解[J];西南民族大学学报(人文社科版);2006年06期
相关博士学位论文 前8条
1 于阜民;假冒专利罪若干问题研究[D];吉林大学;2004年
2 金YТ，
本文编号：2158240
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2158240.html
