论计算机网络域名侵权责任的认定

发布时间：2018-08-02 15:29

【摘要】：计算机网络域名自1985年被首次注册以来，与其他传统民事权益间的冲突就一直没有停息过。由于域名本身法律地位不确定，，域名与其他传统民事权益间的界限模糊不清，因此对于域名侵权责任的认定一直是相关立法的焦点问题，也是个案中双方当事人争议的核心。各国相关立法以及各互联网络管理机构都作出了相关规定，这些规定中比较有代表性的有负责域名分配工作的互联网名称与数字地址分配机构即ICANN所发布的《统一域名争议解决政策》，互联网诞生的美国所颁布的《反网络域名抢注消费者保护法》等，这两份文件对于域名侵权行为的认定所作的规定各具特色，其中《统一域名争议解决政策》的认定模式对我国目前域名领域的相关规定具有较大的影响。在形式上，我国最高人民法院出台的司法解释以及中国互联网络信息中心出台的《域名争议解决办法》与《统一域名争议解决政策》如出一辙，但在具体规定上，各文件又具有较大的差异。客观的说，最高法出台的司法解释与《域名争议解决办法》对于域名侵权责任的认定问题上所作的规定依然是不够完善的。本文从案例出发，对域名技术进行详细介绍之后，对域名的法律性质、域名侵权行为的类型进行了阐释。之后，通过对美国关于域名侵权责任认定的相关立法进行分析，对比我国的相关立法，总结出了域名侵权行为构成的四个要件。最后，本文对我国当前域名领域的立法进行了阐述，并提出了自己的建议。本文共一万八千余字，分为五个部分；第一个部分提出案例；第二个部分对域名进行介绍，对域名的法律性质和法律地位进行了探讨；第三个部分对域名侵权行为进行了分类，并对各类型进行了展开讨论；第四个部分介绍了美国ICANN制定的《统一域名争议解决政策》与国会制定的《反网络域名抢注消费者保护法》中关于域名侵权责任认定的规定，然后探讨了域名侵权责任认定中应考虑的构成要件；文章的第五部分首先对我国目前关于域名侵权的立法进行了介绍，然后对立法中的不足提出了自己的见解。
[Abstract]:Since its first registration in 1985, computer network domain names have been in conflict with other traditional civil rights and interests. Because the legal status of domain name itself is uncertain and the boundary between domain name and other traditional civil rights and interests is blurred, the recognition of domain name tort liability has always been the focus of relevant legislation, and is also the core of the dispute between the two parties in the case. Relevant national legislation and various Internet regulatory agencies have made relevant provisions, The most representative of these provisions is the uniform Domain name dispute Resolution Policy issued by ICANN, the agency responsible for the assignment of domain names and digital addresses, and the Anti-Network issued by the United States when the Internet was born. Domain name grabbing Consumer Protection Law, etc., These two documents have their own characteristics for the identification of domain name infringement, and the model of "uniform Domain name dispute Resolution Policy" has great influence on the related regulations of domain name in our country at present. In form, the judicial interpretation issued by the Supreme people's Court and the "Domain name dispute Resolution" issued by the China Internet Information Center are the same as the "uniform Domain name dispute Resolution Policy", but in terms of specific provisions, Each document also has the big difference. Objectively speaking, the judicial interpretation of Supreme Law and the definition of domain name dispute settlement are still not perfect. After introducing domain name technology in detail, this paper explains the legal nature of domain name and the type of domain name infringement. Then, through the analysis of the relevant legislation of the United States on domain name tort liability, compared with the relevant legislation of our country, summed up the four elements of the domain name tort. Finally, this paper expounds the current domain name legislation in China, and puts forward its own suggestions. There are more than 18000 words in this paper, which are divided into five parts: the first part presents a case; the second part introduces the domain name, discusses the legal nature and legal status of the domain name; the third part classifies the infringement of domain name. The fourth part introduces the definition of domain name tort liability in the United States ICANN's uniform Domain name dispute Resolution Policy and the Congressional Law on Consumer Protection against Internet Domain name grabbing. The fifth part of the article first introduces the current legislation of domain name tort in China, and then puts forward its own views on the shortcomings of the legislation.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923.4;D920.5

【参考文献】