诉讼论证研究
发布时间：2018-11-28 11:29
【摘要】： 从20世纪60、70年代起,西方学者首先开启了对法律论证的系统研究,直至今日,法律论证已成为一个各国学者普遍关注的重要课题。学者们从不同的视角,采取不同的方法和进路对法律论证展开研究,并取得了相当多的理论成果。然而不可否认的是,当前的法律论证研究仍然存在着缺陷。比方说,当前的研究比较松散,学者们的研究普遍缺乏可操作化分析,更为突出的是在普遍承认法律论证包含多种类型的基础上并未对这些类型进行专门化研究,忽略了不同类型的法律论证的差别。针对这些缺陷和不足,本文试图对法律论证的一种重要类型,即诉讼论证进行专门化研究,并进行一定程度的可操作化分析,以期倡导对法律论证展开专门性研究,并对诉讼实践中论证的构建和评价提供一定的指导。 本文共分为五章: 第一章:导论。本章简要介绍了法律论证的研究概况,分析了法律论证研究中存在的问题,进而说明本文的研究缘由及研究的理论意义和现实意义。 第二章:法律论证的基本理论。本章概括地介绍了论证的概念、特征及法律论证的概念、特征,为介绍诉讼论证的基本理论进行铺垫。 第三章:诉讼论证的基本理论。本章明确了诉讼论证的概念及诉讼论证与法律论证的关系,对诉讼论证的特征和结构进行分析,进而使其与其它法律论证类型区别开来。 第四章:诉讼论证的方法。本章试图从指导、构建诉讼论证的角度出发,介绍了逻辑学及其它学科中可适用的论证方法,并对这些方法的运用及评价提出了自己的看法。 第五章:诉讼论证的评价标准。本章从评价一个诉讼论证的“好”、“坏”出发,分析了一个“好”的诉讼论证必须满足的标准包括合法性标准、合理性标准及其它标准,在对这些标准进行分析、介绍的基础上,结合一个诉讼实践中的论证给予了综合性的分析、评价。
[Abstract]:Since the 1960s and 1970s, the western scholars have first started the systematic research on the legal argumentation. Up to now, the legal argumentation has become an important subject that scholars all over the world pay close attention to. From different perspectives, scholars adopt different methods and approaches to study legal argumentation, and have obtained considerable theoretical results. However, it is undeniable that the current research of legal argumentation still has defects. For example, the current research is relatively loose, and scholars generally lack operational analysis. What is more prominent is that legal argumentation does not specialize in these types on the basis of the general recognition that legal argumentation contains many types. The differences between different types of legal arguments are ignored. In view of these defects and shortcomings, this paper attempts to conduct a specialized study on the legal argumentation, that is, the litigation argumentation, and to carry out a certain degree of operational analysis, in order to advocate the development of a special research on the legal argumentation. It also provides some guidance for the construction and evaluation of argumentation in litigation practice. This paper is divided into five chapters: chapter one: introduction. This chapter briefly introduces the research situation of legal argumentation, analyzes the existing problems in the research of legal argumentation, and then explains the reason of the research and the theoretical and practical significance of the research. Chapter two: the basic theory of legal argumentation. This chapter briefly introduces the concept, characteristics and legal argumentation of legal argumentation, paving the way for introducing the basic theory of litigation argumentation. Chapter three: the basic theory of litigation argument. This chapter clarifies the concept of litigation argumentation and the relationship between litigation argumentation and legal argumentation, analyzes the characteristics and structure of litigation argumentation, and distinguishes it from other legal argumentation types. Chapter four: the method of lawsuit argumentation. This chapter attempts to introduce the applicable argumentation methods in logic and other disciplines from the angle of guiding and constructing litigation argumentation, and puts forward its own views on the application and evaluation of these methods. Chapter five: the evaluation standard of litigation argument. This chapter starts from evaluating the "good" and "bad" of a lawsuit argument, and analyzes the criteria that a "good" lawsuit argument must meet, including the criterion of legality, the standard of rationality and other standards. On the basis of introduction, the author gives a comprehensive analysis and evaluation combined with a demonstration in litigation practice.
【学位授予单位】：云南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D915.1;D90-05
[Abstract]:Since the 1960s and 1970s, the western scholars have first started the systematic research on the legal argumentation. Up to now, the legal argumentation has become an important subject that scholars all over the world pay close attention to. From different perspectives, scholars adopt different methods and approaches to study legal argumentation, and have obtained considerable theoretical results. However, it is undeniable that the current research of legal argumentation still has defects. For example, the current research is relatively loose, and scholars generally lack operational analysis. What is more prominent is that legal argumentation does not specialize in these types on the basis of the general recognition that legal argumentation contains many types. The differences between different types of legal arguments are ignored. In view of these defects and shortcomings, this paper attempts to conduct a specialized study on the legal argumentation, that is, the litigation argumentation, and to carry out a certain degree of operational analysis, in order to advocate the development of a special research on the legal argumentation. It also provides some guidance for the construction and evaluation of argumentation in litigation practice. This paper is divided into five chapters: chapter one: introduction. This chapter briefly introduces the research situation of legal argumentation, analyzes the existing problems in the research of legal argumentation, and then explains the reason of the research and the theoretical and practical significance of the research. Chapter two: the basic theory of legal argumentation. This chapter briefly introduces the concept, characteristics and legal argumentation of legal argumentation, paving the way for introducing the basic theory of litigation argumentation. Chapter three: the basic theory of litigation argument. This chapter clarifies the concept of litigation argumentation and the relationship between litigation argumentation and legal argumentation, analyzes the characteristics and structure of litigation argumentation, and distinguishes it from other legal argumentation types. Chapter four: the method of lawsuit argumentation. This chapter attempts to introduce the applicable argumentation methods in logic and other disciplines from the angle of guiding and constructing litigation argumentation, and puts forward its own views on the application and evaluation of these methods. Chapter five: the evaluation standard of litigation argument. This chapter starts from evaluating the "good" and "bad" of a lawsuit argument, and analyzes the criteria that a "good" lawsuit argument must meet, including the criterion of legality, the standard of rationality and other standards. On the basis of introduction, the author gives a comprehensive analysis and evaluation combined with a demonstration in litigation practice.
【学位授予单位】：云南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D915.1;D90-05
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 戚金霞;张学立;;试论法律论证的充分性[J];毕节学院学报;2008年02期
2 张晓光;;法律论证中的理由逻辑[J];经济师;2008年01期
3 李卫华;;司法视角下的价值判断和法律论证——以阿列克西法律论证理论为对象[J];山西财经大学学报(高等教育版);2009年S1期
4 周峗;;法律论证的概念——系统—结构主义的进路[J];华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年02期
5 王建芳;;近年国内法律逻辑研究述评[J];重庆理工大学学报(社会科学);2011年08期
6 宗德钧;潘莉;;试论公诉阶段检察法律文书中的法律论证[J];法制与社会;2010年21期
7 徐楠;;浅议法律逻辑研究的转向[J];沧桑;2009年01期
8 侯学勇;;麦考密克论融贯[J];政法论丛;2008年02期
9 谢晖;;法律的意义模糊及其救济方法[J];法制与社会发展;2009年01期
10 黎慈;;关于法官依常理断案的思考[J];桂海论丛;2008年03期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 卢春荣;王森波;;阿列克西法律论证理论述评[A];当代法学论坛（二○一○年第1辑）[C];2010年
2 潘文爵;;法律为什么要论证——试论法律论证的可能[A];第十六届全国法律逻辑学术讨论会论文（成就·反思·前瞻——中国法律逻辑三十年）[C];2008年
3 欧晓彬;;浅谈法律论证[A];第十六届全国法律逻辑学术讨论会论文（成就·反思·前瞻——中国法律逻辑三十年）[C];2008年
4 张庆彦;;法律适用中的后果考量[A];法律逻辑与法律思维——第十七届全国法律逻辑学术讨论会交流论文[C];2009年
5 王晓;王s，
本文编号：2362701
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2362701.html
