指导性案例社会推荐模式初论——以《最高人民法院关于案例指导工作的规定》为例

发布时间：2018-12-25 10:27

【摘要】：指导性案例社会推荐模式展示出最高法院的"民主化"姿态。由于指导性案例具有公共政策形成功能,契合了最高法院作为政治机构的需要,因此这一"民主化"动向应予以肯定,同时,指导性案例作为总结审判经验、统一法律适用的专业性司法机制,其社会推荐模式也不应在"民主化"上践行过远。就当下而言,社会推荐模式呈现出几乎被虚置的困境,这主要是受社会认知度、裁判文书公共度、指导性案例的效力和数量、推荐的层级性、决策程序的回应机制以及技术性保障机制等因素制约。此外,从比较法视角来看,案例指导制度常态运行后,社会推荐模式的功能发挥也可能会因社会主体的不同心理期待及能力产生畸变。为促进指导性案例社会推荐模式的有效运作,需要制度规范展开进一步的调整完善。
[Abstract]:The social recommendation model of instructive cases shows the "democratization" posture of the Supreme Court. Since the guiding case has the function of forming public policy, it meets the needs of the Supreme Court as a political institution, so this trend of "democratization" should be affirmed. At the same time, the guiding case should be used as a summary of the trial experience. The model of social recommendation should not be carried out too far in democratization. For the moment, the social recommendation model presents a dilemma that is almost virtual. This is mainly due to the degree of social recognition, the public degree of adjudicative documents, the effectiveness and number of guiding cases, and the hierarchy of recommendations. The response mechanism of decision-making procedure and the technical safeguard mechanism and so on factor restriction. In addition, from the perspective of comparative law, the function of social recommendation model may be distorted by the different psychological expectation and ability of the social subject after the normal operation of the case guidance system. In order to promote the effective operation of the social recommendation model of guiding cases, it is necessary to further adjust and perfect the system.
【作者单位】：四川大学法学院;
【基金】：最高人民法院2011年审判理论重大课题“中国特色案例指导制度的发展与完善”
【分类号】：D971.2

【共引文献】