论清末法理派的法律思想
[Abstract]:The reform of law in the late Qing Dynasty was an important part of the New deal in the late Qing Dynasty, and it was also the product of the conflict between Chinese traditional culture and western legal culture. Around the discipline, there are great differences within the ruling class. There was a famous dispute between the Rite sect represented by Luo Naixuan and the Legalist School represented by Shen Jiaben. This controversy directly influenced the modernization of Chinese modern law and promoted the modern transformation of Chinese law. In the end, the dispute between the Legalist School and the Etiquette School ended in the temporary compromise of the Legalist School. At the end of Qing Dynasty, the Legalist School drafted and revised many legal documents, but few of them were actually implemented. It should be affirmed that in the late Qing Dynasty, the legal school made a great contribution in transplanting the western legal system, constructing the modern Chinese legal system, and formulating the relevant laws. In particular, it plays an important and far-reaching role in the development of Chinese legal history and the history of Chinese legal ideology. Because of the conflict between the traditional culture and the western culture in China at that time, the leading legal transplant movement fell into a misunderstanding at the beginning, which had great limitations. Through the systematic analysis of the background of the law reform in the late Qing Dynasty, the author analyzes the legal thought and characteristics of the law school group in the late Qing Dynasty, and studies the participation of the law school group in the late Qing Dynasty. It is of great practical significance to study its profound influence on the modernization of Chinese law and the reform of Chinese social ideological trend. It also has important reference and guiding significance for our country to run the country according to law and to promote the modernization of the rule of law.
【学位授予单位】:黑龙江大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2009
【分类号】:D909.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 吕震乾;;试论清末修律对中国近代法制转型的影响[J];安阳工学院学报;2008年01期
2 阿兰·沃森,贺卫方;法律移植论[J];比较法研究;1989年01期
3 马作武;媒介中西一“冰人”——沈家本新论[J];比较法研究;1995年02期
4 李贵连;保定教案与沈家本被拘考[J];比较法研究;2000年01期
5 沈厚铎;法子匡时为国重,高名重后以书传——一代法子沈家本的人生轨迹与法学建树[J];比较法研究;2001年02期
6 曾尔恕,黄宇昕;中华法律现代化的原点——沈家本西法认识形成刍议[J];比较法研究;2003年04期
7 陈国庆,聂文俊;评析沈家本与清末修律[J];长春大学学报;2005年05期
8 周向阳;;杨度宪政思想略论[J];船山学刊;2006年04期
9 张文,何慧新;中国刑法学二十世纪的回顾、反思与展望[J];当代法学;1999年01期
10 黄长杰,郑雷;清末“礼法之争”对今天法制建设的启示[J];东方论坛(青岛大学学报);2000年04期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 张德美;晚清法律移值研究[D];中国政法大学;2002年
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 于建胜;试论伍廷芳与清末法制改革[D];山东师范大学;2005年
2 汪合生;伍廷芳的法律思想述评[D];安徽大学;2007年
3 张光剑;清末修律与中国近代法制现代化[D];吉林大学;2008年
4 陈娟;礼法之争与礼法两派不同选择原因的实证分析[D];河南大学;2008年
,本文编号:2391544
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2391544.html