交叉质询话语中的权势关系
发布时间:2021-02-15 19:53
语言在法律领域的重要地位自古就得到了认可。法律是通过词语订立和公布的,语言是法律的载体,所以自法的诞生之日起,就有了法律语言。 近年来,国外越来越多的语言学家为具体的案例作了大量的语言研究工作,并以专家的身份为法律界提供质询或出庭作证。他们的工作涉及的学科多为语音学和笔迹学,如对笔迹和录音材料的辨认和分析。在这些领域,研究方法已发展地相当成熟。而法律话语分析,尤其是法庭话语分析,已成为语言学研究的新热点,其研究方法尚未发展成熟。 法庭话语主要包括控辩双方的开庭综述、法庭询问、结案辩论及反质辩论等。法庭话语分析的主要内容之一是“律师-证人”型询问(examination)话语分析,其中交叉质询(cross-examination)为重中之重。在英美法系中,询问分三种,一种是控辩双方对本方证人的询问,称为直接询问(direct examination)。第二种是控辩双方对他方证人的询问,称为交叉质询。第三种是控辩双方在认为有必要时对被交叉质询过的本方证人再做询问,称为复问(re-examination)。一般说来,询问是以问答式的语言行为进行的。其目的是获取对本方有利的信息。 ...
【文章来源】:河南大学河南省
【文章页数】:84 页
【学位级别】:硕士
【文章目录】:
Acknowledgements
Abstract (Chinese)
Abstract (English)
Chapter Ⅰ Power, Discourse and Legal Discourse
1. Views on Power
1.1 Ancient Views on Power
1.2 Concepts of Power in the Twentieth Century
1.3 Summary of Power
2. Basic Concept of Discourse
2.1 Linguistic Sense of Discourse
2.2 The Social Sense of Discourse
2.3 The Relationship Between the Two Senses of Discourse
3. The Relationship between Power and Discourse
4. Legal Discourse
4.1 Law and Language
4.2 General Tendency of the Contemporary Discourse Study
4.3 New Approaches to Legal Discourse
4.4 The Reason of Choosing Cross-examination as Data
Chapter Ⅱ Turn-taking Organization and Linguistic Features of Cross-examination
1. Turn-taking
1.1 Turn-taking Organization for Conversation
1.2 Turn-taking Organization for Cross-examination
1.3 The Difference and Consequences That the Pre-Allocation System for Cross-examination Makes
2. The Strategies used by Lawyers in Cross-examination
2.1 Silence
2.2 Question Form
2.3 Topic Management
2.4 Commentary
2.5 The Witness's Capacity for Knowledge
3. Turn-taking Organization and Lawyer's Strategies over Witness
Chapter Ⅲ Modality Analysis of Discourse of Cross-examination
1. Interpersonal Metafunction and Modality
2. Introduction to Modality System in Systemic Functional Grammar
2.1 Modalization and Modulation
2.2 Metaphors of Modality and System of Orientations
2.3 Value of Modality
2.4 Summary of Modality System
3. Sample Analysis of Modality System in Cross-examination
3.1 Cross-examination Concerning O. J. Simpson Trial
3.2 Results of the Analysis
3.2.1 Analysis of Utterances by the Lawyer
3.2.2 Analysis of Utterances by the Witness
3.2.3 Statistic Results of Analysis of Utterances by the Lawyer and the Witness
3.3 Discussion of the Results
3.3.1 Metaphorical Modality system
3.3.2 Non-Metaphorical Modality System
3.3.3 Inner-sentence Modality Accumulation
3.3.4 Inter-sentence Modality Accumulation
3.4 Summary of the Modality Analysis
Chapter Ⅳ Conclusion
Appendix
Bibliography
【参考文献】:
期刊论文
[1]情态—从句子到语篇的推广[J]. 李战子. 外语学刊. 2000(04)
[2]西方法律语言研究方法刍议[J]. 陈腾澜. 复旦学报(社会科学版). 2000(02)
本文编号:3035444
【文章来源】:河南大学河南省
【文章页数】:84 页
【学位级别】:硕士
【文章目录】:
Acknowledgements
Abstract (Chinese)
Abstract (English)
Chapter Ⅰ Power, Discourse and Legal Discourse
1. Views on Power
1.1 Ancient Views on Power
1.2 Concepts of Power in the Twentieth Century
1.3 Summary of Power
2. Basic Concept of Discourse
2.1 Linguistic Sense of Discourse
2.2 The Social Sense of Discourse
2.3 The Relationship Between the Two Senses of Discourse
3. The Relationship between Power and Discourse
4. Legal Discourse
4.1 Law and Language
4.2 General Tendency of the Contemporary Discourse Study
4.3 New Approaches to Legal Discourse
4.4 The Reason of Choosing Cross-examination as Data
Chapter Ⅱ Turn-taking Organization and Linguistic Features of Cross-examination
1. Turn-taking
1.1 Turn-taking Organization for Conversation
1.2 Turn-taking Organization for Cross-examination
1.3 The Difference and Consequences That the Pre-Allocation System for Cross-examination Makes
2. The Strategies used by Lawyers in Cross-examination
2.1 Silence
2.2 Question Form
2.3 Topic Management
2.4 Commentary
2.5 The Witness's Capacity for Knowledge
3. Turn-taking Organization and Lawyer's Strategies over Witness
Chapter Ⅲ Modality Analysis of Discourse of Cross-examination
1. Interpersonal Metafunction and Modality
2. Introduction to Modality System in Systemic Functional Grammar
2.1 Modalization and Modulation
2.2 Metaphors of Modality and System of Orientations
2.3 Value of Modality
2.4 Summary of Modality System
3. Sample Analysis of Modality System in Cross-examination
3.1 Cross-examination Concerning O. J. Simpson Trial
3.2 Results of the Analysis
3.2.1 Analysis of Utterances by the Lawyer
3.2.2 Analysis of Utterances by the Witness
3.2.3 Statistic Results of Analysis of Utterances by the Lawyer and the Witness
3.3 Discussion of the Results
3.3.1 Metaphorical Modality system
3.3.2 Non-Metaphorical Modality System
3.3.3 Inner-sentence Modality Accumulation
3.3.4 Inter-sentence Modality Accumulation
3.4 Summary of the Modality Analysis
Chapter Ⅳ Conclusion
Appendix
Bibliography
【参考文献】:
期刊论文
[1]情态—从句子到语篇的推广[J]. 李战子. 外语学刊. 2000(04)
[2]西方法律语言研究方法刍议[J]. 陈腾澜. 复旦学报(社会科学版). 2000(02)
本文编号:3035444
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/3035444.html