当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 司法论文 >

我国司法解释的规范化问题研究

发布时间:2017-12-30 22:47

  本文关键词:我国司法解释的规范化问题研究 出处:《辽宁大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


  更多相关文章: 司法解释 规范化 抽象性司法解释 监督机制


【摘要】:司法解释是法律解释的一种,是最高司法机关对法律的具体适用所做的解释,司法解释规范化是对司法解释的主体、权限、程序等进行的规制。在当代社会,司法解释发挥着不可小觑的作用,建国以来,“宜粗不宜细”的立法政策和成文法固有的僵硬性与滞后性,使得司法解释在我国的存在成为必然,且发挥着弥补立法不足,填补法律漏洞的重要意义,在实践中,司法解释是法官正确应用法律审判案件的依据,是当事人维护权益的手段,是解决社会矛盾和纠纷的工具,是实现法治统一的保障,司法解释有着这么重要的意义,我们应当充分发挥其应有的功效,保证司法解释对于调整社会关系,缓解社会矛盾,维护社会和谐稳定发挥其特有的作用,然而,目前我国司法解释却存在着很多不规范的现象,,亟待我们加以研究解决。 本文在简要的介绍了司法解释规范化的重要意义和理论基础后,对我国现行司法解释的现状进行分析,总结出了现行司法解释存在的一些不规范现象,如立法关于司法解释工作的规定不健全、司法解释呈现泛滥化和立法化的趋势、“两高”司法解释的内容和效力冲突、司法解释制定和发布程序不规范以及司法解释的监督制约机制缺乏等等,并对这些不规范现象的成因进行分析,总结出为什么我国司法解释会出现这些不规范的现象,“两高”的解释权限界定不清使得两机关的解释内容和效力发生冲突、“宜粗不宜细”的立法政策决定了司法解释必然出现立法化的趋势、立法和监督机制的不完善使得司法解释的制定和发布程序不规范且出现泛滥化的趋势等等,进而对我国司法解释规范化提出了一些自己的见解,首先,在立法方面,建议制定一部专门的《司法解释法》,以立法的高度对司法解释的制定主体、权限、程序、范围、监督等进行全面而详尽的规定,其次,专门论述了司法解释的监督制约机制,明确全国人民代表大会常务委员会为司法解释的监督机关,同时要加强社会监督,利用现代信息技术网络加强对司法解释的有效监督,使司法解释能够越来越规范,进而促使我国法治能够更好的实现公平。
[Abstract]:The judicial interpretation is a legal interpretation of the specific application, is the highest judicial organ of the law the interpretation of judicial interpretation is the standardized permissions on the subject, the judicial interpretation of the procedures for the regulation. In contemporary society, plays an important role in judicial interpretation, since 1949, the rigidity and hysteresis of coarse "legislative policy and statute law inherent, making the judicial interpretation inevitably exists in our country, and plays an important significance to make up for the lack of legislation, to fill loopholes in the law, in practice, the judicial interpretation is the correct application of the law a trial basis, is the means to safeguard the rights and interests, is to solve the problem social conflicts and disputes, is the realization of the unified legal system guarantee, has such an important significance of judicial interpretation, we should give full play to its due effect, ensure the judicial interpretation to adjust social relations, To alleviate social contradictions and maintain social harmony and stability, it plays a unique role. However, at present, there are many irregular phenomena in our judicial interpretation, which urgently need us to study and solve.
This paper briefly introduces the significance and theoretical basis of the standardization of the judicial interpretation, the status quo of China's current judicial interpretation of the analysis, summed up the current judicial interpretation of some non-standard phenomena, such as the legislation on judicial interpretation of the provisions is not perfect, explain the present flood and the trend of the legislation of company law the content and effect of the conflict, judicial interpretation, judicial interpretations formulated and promulgated procedures are not standardized and the supervision and restriction mechanism of the lack of judicial interpretation and so on, and the causes of these abnormal phenomena are analyzed, summarized why China's judicial interpretation will appear the phenomenon of non-standard "high" interpretation authority is not defined the two clear agency's interpretation content and effect of the conflict, "the legislative policy should be detailed" determines the judicial interpretation of the inevitable trend of legislation, legislation and supervision The imperfect mechanism makes the judicial interpretations formulated and promulgated procedures are not standardized and flood trend and so on, and then to the standardization and puts forward some opinions of China's judicial interpretation, first of all, in the aspect of legislation, propose a special "judicial interpretation method", with the height of the legislative body, making the judicial interpretation of the authority, scope, procedures, supervision and conduct a comprehensive and detailed provisions, secondly, discusses the judicial interpretation of supervision and restriction mechanism, clear the National People's Congress Standing Committee for the supervision of judicial interpretation, at the same time, to strengthen social supervision, strengthen the effective supervision of the judicial interpretation of the use of modern information technology network. The judicial interpretation will become increasingly standardized, and promote the rule of law in our country can achieve better fairness.

【学位授予单位】:辽宁大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D926

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 张榕;;司法能动性何以实现?——以最高人民法院司法解释为分析基础[J];法律科学(西北政法学院学报);2007年05期

2 田芳;;法律解释如何统一——关于司法解释权的法律统一解释功能的思考[J];法律科学(西北政法学院学报);2007年06期

3 张新宝;王伟国;;最高人民法院民商事司法解释溯及力问题探讨[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2010年06期

4 袁明圣;司法解释“立法化”现象探微[J];法商研究;2003年02期

5 陈新民;;论中央与地方法律关系的变革[J];法学;2007年05期

6 张勇;;规范性司法解释在法律体系实施中的责任和使命[J];法学;2011年08期

7 李晓霞;;论最高人民法院司法解释的合法性[J];河北工程大学学报(社会科学版);2008年03期

8 郑美慧;;论我国司法解释制定主体的现状与规范[J];韶关学院学报;2011年07期

9 曹士兵;;最高人民法院裁判、司法解释的法律地位[J];中国法学;2006年03期

10 赵春凤;;从最高人民法院工作报告看司法解释[J];国家检察官学院学报;2010年03期



本文编号:1356887

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1356887.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户c04a0***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com