民事检察监督范围研究

发布时间：2018-01-22 00:18

本文关键词： 检察监督诉讼监督审判监督　出处：《辽宁大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：我国宪法和检察院组织法将检察机关定位为法律监督机关，这一职能定位为检察监督范围的拓展奠定了基础。但现有法律的规定过于原则性，缺乏具体的程序性规定，导致民事检察监督的范围仅停留在诉后阶段。属于公益诉讼的诉前阶段、属于参加之诉的诉中阶段以及属于执行监督的诉后阶段苦于无法律依据而无法纳入检察机关的视野。因此，只有从现有民事检察监督的范围出发，找到民事检察监督范围的缺陷及阻碍其拓展的因素，并针对这些问题找到科学的应对方法，才能最终达到民事检察监督对民事诉讼的全覆盖。本文由前言、正文和后记三部分组成，其中正文分为五个部分。第一部分为民事检察监督范围的基础理论。该部分介绍了民事检察监督权与民事法律监督权的位阶关系、民事检察监督权的含义和内容。并从应然角度对民事检察监督范围作出了界定。第二部分为检察机关参与民事诉讼范围的国外法考察。分别介绍了苏俄模式、英美模式、德日模式和法国模式中检察机关参与民事诉讼的范围。通过比较后得到启示：我国应立足本国国情，，引进国外民事公诉制度及参与诉讼制度，实现民事检察监督范围的全面拓展。第三部分为我国民事检察监督范围的现状及缺陷分析。从民事检察监督范围的理论纷争和立法现状出发，分析出我国民事检察范围的缺陷在于诉前监督、诉中监督及执行监督缺位。同时分析了阻碍民事检察监督立法完善的因素。第四部分主要针对第三部分的缺陷及立法障碍，对诉前监督及诉中监督的可行性进行论证。第五部分阐述了对我国民事检察监督范围的调整思路。即更新监督理念、构建民事检察监督相关制度、调整现行立法，以使检察监督范围的拓展落到实处。
[Abstract]:The constitution of our country and the organization law of procuratorate set the procuratorial organ as the legal supervisory organ, which laid the foundation for the expansion of the scope of procuratorial supervision, but the provisions of the existing law are too principled. Lack of specific procedural provisions, resulting in the scope of civil prosecution supervision only stay in the post-litigation stage. It is difficult to bring it into the perspective of procuratorial organs because of the lack of legal basis in the middle stage of litigation and the post-appeal stage of enforcement supervision. Therefore, only from the scope of the existing civil procuratorial supervision. Only by finding the defects of the scope of civil procuratorial supervision and the factors hindering its expansion, and finding a scientific way to deal with these problems, can the civil procuratorial supervision reach the full coverage of civil litigation. This paper consists of three parts: preface, text and postscript, in which the text is divided into five parts. The first part is the basic theory of the scope of civil procuratorial supervision. This part introduces the rank relationship between civil procuratorial supervision and civil legal supervision. The meaning and content of civil procuratorial supervision power. And the scope of civil procuratorial supervision should be defined. The second part of the procuratorial organs to participate in the scope of civil proceedings in foreign law investigation, respectively introduced the Soviet Russian model. The scope of procuratorial organs' participation in civil litigation in Anglo-American model, German-Japanese model and French model. Through comparison, we can get enlightenment: our country should base on our own national conditions, introduce foreign civil public prosecution system and participate in litigation system. The third part is the analysis of the current situation and defects of the scope of civil procuratorial supervision in China. From the theoretical disputes and legislative status of the scope of civil procuratorial supervision. Analysis of the scope of our civil prosecution defects lies in the pre-prosecution supervision. At the same time, the author analyzes the factors hindering the improvement of civil procuratorial supervision legislation. Part 4th mainly focuses on the third part of the defects and legislative obstacles. In part 5th, the author expounds the idea of adjusting the scope of civil procuratorial supervision in China, that is, renewing the concept of supervision and constructing the relevant system of civil procuratorial supervision. Adjust the current legislation in order to expand the scope of procuratorial supervision.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926.3

【参考文献】