如何实现“法院独立”与“法官独立”的统一——法院改革的策略选择

发布时间：2018-03-03 07:51

本文选题：法院独立　切入点：法官独立　出处：《求是学刊》2016年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】："法院独立"与"法官独立"并非两种对立的司法组织原则。法院独立具有政体面向,而法官独立体现司法技术要求。法院独立服务于法官独立,法院体制为法官行使职权提供庇护,屏蔽各种不利于法官独立的干扰。此外,法官还需要专门的职业保护。在我国司法体制改革推进策略中,以去地方化为方向的法院独立应具有优先性;当下作为阶段性目标的"法官独立"应适度而为,为实现法官独立需要去除的,是那些有违司法规律、明显钳制法官自主性、不利于提高法官素养的行政化因素。法院改革中对审判组织层面的问题有所忽视,应以合议制审判组织运行技术规则为法官独立与受制的平衡点;陪审制不能法院化,而应国家化,在司法体制改革中应与法院改革齐头并进。
[Abstract]:"the independence of the court" and "the independence of the judge" are not two opposing principles of judicial organization. The independence of the court is oriented towards the polity, while the independence of the judge embodies the technical requirements of the judiciary, and the court serves the independence of the judge independently. The court system provides asylum for judges to exercise their functions and powers, and shields against any interference that is not conducive to the independence of judges. In addition, judges also need special professional protection. The independence of the court in the direction of going to the local place should be given priority; the "independence of judges", as a phased goal at present, should be moderately and appropriately done. In order to realize the independence of judges, what needs to be removed is those that are contrary to the law of justice and obviously restrain the autonomy of judges. In court reform, the problems of trial organization should be ignored, and the technical rules of collegial trial organization should be taken as the balance point between the independence and restriction of judges, and the jury system should not be courted. It should be nationalized and should go hand in hand with the reform of the court in the reform of the judicial system.
【作者单位】：辽宁大学法学院;
【基金】：中国法学会“法院独立与法官独立相统一的法院体制改革策略”,项目编号:CLS(2015)D112 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“刑事诉讼法学方法论及运用”,项目编号:13YJC820087 辽宁省社科规划基金重点项目“刑事诉讼无罪化机制与冤案防范”,项目编号:L14FX003
【分类号】：D926.2

【相似文献】