司法过程中的价值衡量研究

发布时间：2018-03-16 04:08

本文选题：司法过程　切入点：价值衡量　出处：《中国政法大学》2014年博士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本文以司法过程中的价值衡量作为研究对象,一是要说明价值衡量在司法中的存在,二则是要解决司法中价值衡量的客观化问题。论文的前三章主要是围绕第一个问题展开的论述,而在对价值衡量在司法中的具体表现进行分析之后,引出第二个问题,并通过后三章的论述对此问题予以解决。前言和结论部分则是对本文的问题意识与核心关注进行的概括与总结。前言部分重点交代问题意识、理论渊源与研究现状、本文的研究范围与思路。本文的问题意识在于,价值衡量作为突破传统法律方法适用瓶颈的一种新的法律方法,其在司法中是如何存在的,并且如何才能保证其客观化；对于理论渊源及研究现状,作者主要是就国内外与司法的价值衡量有关的知识和材料进行了介绍；本文的研究范围与思路则侧重对两个问题进行说明,即研究范围的限定及论文各个章节的基本内容与联系。第一章,司法中价值衡量的界定。首先阐明什么是价值与价值衡量,之后指出在法学中存在两种形式的价值衡量,一种是立法中的价值衡量,另一种是司法中的价值衡量。在此基础上,笔者探讨了价值衡量在司法中的表现形态。第二章,价值衡量在司法中存在的场域。作者主要围绕疑难案件的解决与价值衡量、法律原则的适用与价值衡量以及传统法律方法的适用与价值衡量等三个问题展开论述,用以说明价值衡量在司法中的存在。第三章,价值衡量在司法中的具体表现。以在法律体系中存在的三大实体法的分类为基础,作者分别对民法适用中的价值衡量、刑法适用中的价值衡量以及行政审判中的价值衡量进行了分析,并结合案例进行说明。在此基础上,作者提出了在司法中进行价值衡量所面临的难题,即价值衡量的客观化问题。第四章,价值衡量客观化的路径之一——遵循价值位阶的价值衡量。在这一章中,针对司法中价值衡量的客观化难题,作者首先承认存在着一个法的价值体系,并且在这个价值体系中存在着价值的分层,即价值位阶。而遵循价值位阶的价值衡量实际上主要是一个对价值位阶进行发现的过程。第五章,价值衡量客观化的路径之二——比例性衡量。本章通过对比例原则的内涵进行分析,指出比例原则与价值衡量存在着双重关系,特别是比例原则对价值衡量能够形成一种控制,从而保障着价值衡量的客观化。基于此,可以在价值衡量中引入比例原则,进行比例性的衡量。第六章,价值衡量客观化的程序保障。本章首先论述了正当法律程序对价值衡量客观化的正向保障作用,这主要是通过审判程序的结构原则和运行原则来实现的；其次论述了法律论证程序对价值衡量客观化的逆向保障作用,而在法律论证的各种方法中又以程序性法律论证方法对价值衡量客观化的保障最为有力。
[Abstract]:This article regards the value measurement in the judicial process as the research object, the first is to explain the existence of the value measurement in the judicature. The first three chapters mainly focus on the discussion of the first problem, and after analyzing the concrete performance of the value measurement in the judicature, it leads to the second question. The preface and conclusion are the summary and summary of the problem consciousness and core concern. The preface focuses on explaining the consciousness of the problem, the origin of the theory and the present situation of the research, and the scope and thinking of the research. The problem consciousness of this paper lies in that the value measurement is a new legal method which breaks through the bottleneck of the application of the traditional legal method. How to exist in the judicial system and how to ensure its objectivity, the author mainly introduces the knowledge and materials related to the value measurement of the judicature at home and abroad. The research scope and thought of this paper focus on two issues, namely, the limitation of the research scope and the basic content and relation of each chapter of the paper. The first chapter is the definition of value measurement in judicature. First, it clarifies what is value and value measurement, and then points out that there are two forms of value measurement in law, one is value measure in legislation, the other is value measurement in legislation. The other is the value measurement in the judicature, and on this basis, the author discusses the form of the value measurement in the judicature. The second chapter, the field of value measurement in the judicature. The author mainly discusses three problems: the solution and value measurement of difficult cases, the application and value measurement of legal principles, and the application and value measurement of traditional legal methods. Used to illustrate the existence of a value measure in the administration of justice. Based on the classification of the three substantive laws in the legal system, the author measures the value in the application of civil law. The value measurement in the application of criminal law and the value measurement in the administrative trial are analyzed, and the case is explained. On this basis, the author puts forward the difficult problems of the value measurement in the administration of justice. Namely, the objective problem of value measurement. Chapter 4th, one of the paths to objectification of value measurement-follows the value measurement of value rank. In this chapter, in view of the difficult problem of objectification of value measurement in justice, the author first acknowledges the existence of a value system of law. And there is a hierarchy of value in this value system, that is, the value rank, and the value measurement following the value rank is mainly a process of discovering the value rank. Chapter 5th, the path of objectification of value measurement, is proportional measurement. This chapter analyzes the connotation of the principle of proportion and points out that there is a double relationship between the principle of proportion and the measure of value. In particular, the principle of proportion can form a kind of control over the measurement of value, which ensures the objectification of the measure of value, based on which the principle of proportion can be introduced into the measurement of value to carry on the measure of proportionality. Chapter 6th, procedural guarantee of objectification of value measurement. This chapter firstly discusses the positive safeguard function of due legal procedure to the objectification of value measurement, which is mainly realized by the principle of structure and operation of trial procedure; Secondly, it discusses the reverse safeguard function of the legal argumentation procedure to the objectification of the value measurement, and the procedural legal argumentation method is the most effective in the various methods of the legal argumentation to guarantee the objectification of the value measurement.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D916.2

【参考文献】