论能动司法及其限度

发布时间：2018-03-23 15:00

本文选题：能动司法　切入点：司法权　出处：《南京师范大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：能动司法的提出可谓是中国法律人顺应历史潮流对传统司法理念的调整和革新。在这个调整和革新的过程中,势必会对传统司法理念的一些基本价值观念构成冲击和挑战。这就需要能动司法保持一定的限度,在合理的边界内良好运行,从而防止司法权的擅断和滥用,这就要求能动司法必须坚持党的领导,坚持司法的基本价值取向,树立司法权威,结合自身特点和基本国情,以此指导司法实践,为我国司法制度的合理构建添砖添瓦。此外为了能使能动司法在司法实践中良好运行,我们还必须深刻认识其法理依据,做到求本溯源,牢牢抓住其本质和精髓,只有这样才能对我们更好的认识能动司法理念起到一个高屋建瓴的作用。综上所述,本文旨在揭示能动司法的内在依据,探寻其合理边界,为了能更好的探讨这个问题,本文分为三个部分：第一部分主要介绍能动司法的一般理论,对能动司法的内涵、本质属性,基本特征等作一个概括了解,为论述能动司法的法理依据和边界提供理论土壤。在这一部分中作者充分引用了国内外著名法学家对能动司法的相关研究,并结合对美国司法能动主义内涵的探讨,系统的对我国能动司法的基本问题做了深入的论述。这对我们更深刻的理解能动司法起到了非常重要的作用。第二部分主要从司法权的特征及其运作规律入手阐释能动司法的法理依据。这可以说是本文的一点创新,通过对司法权的特征和其运作规律的研究我们会发现能动司法不但没有颠覆传统司法理念的基本价值,而且还迎合和深化了传统司法理念的价值取向,并且拓宽和加深了司法权研究的广度和深度。通过对司法权系统深入的探究找到能动司法背后所蕴含的法理,以此指导我们的司法实践。第三部分主要寻求能动司法的限度,首先论述了能动司法规制的必要性,然后从“他律”和“自限”两方面入手探讨能动司法的边界,通过对国外相关制度的分析和研究并结合我国现阶段司法基本国情,找到一个合理的边界来规制能动司法,以此防止司法权的擅断和滥用。从而使能动司法的理念更好的为社会主义法制建设服务。
[Abstract]:The proposal of active justice can be described as the adjustment and innovation of the traditional judicial concept by Chinese legal personnel following the trend of history. In this process of adjustment and innovation, It will inevitably impact and challenge some basic values of the traditional judicial concept. This requires that the judicial system should be kept to a certain limit and run well within a reasonable boundary, thus preventing the judicial power from being arbitrary and abused. This requires that the active judiciary must adhere to the leadership of the party, adhere to the basic value orientation of the judiciary, establish judicial authority, combine its own characteristics and basic national conditions to guide judicial practice. In addition, in order to make the active judicature run well in judicial practice, we must deeply understand its legal basis, so as to trace its origin and grasp its essence and essence. Only in this way can we better understand the active concept of justice play a role from a strategic point. To sum up, this paper aims to reveal the internal basis of active justice, explore its reasonable boundaries, in order to better explore this problem, this paper is divided into three parts: the first part mainly introduces the general theory of active justice. To make a general understanding of the connotation, nature and basic characteristics of active justice, In this part, the author makes a full reference to the relevant research on active justice made by famous jurists at home and abroad, and probes into the connotation of judicial activism in the United States. The basic problems of active justice in our country are discussed systematically, which plays a very important role in our deeper understanding of active justice. The second part mainly discusses the characteristics of judicial power and its operation rules. The legal basis for the release and active administration of justice. This can be said to be a little innovation in this paper. Through the study of the characteristics of judicial power and its operation law, we can find that active justice not only does not subvert the basic value of traditional judicial idea, but also caters to and deepens the value orientation of traditional judicial idea. It also widens and deepens the breadth and depth of the research on judicial power. Through the deep exploration of judicial power system, it finds out the legal theory behind the active judicature in order to guide our judicial practice. The third part mainly seeks the limits of active judicature. This paper first discusses the necessity of active judicial regulation, then probes into the boundary of active judicature from the two aspects of "heteronomy" and "self-restriction", through the analysis and study of relevant foreign systems and combining with the basic conditions of our country's current judicial situation. To find a reasonable boundary to regulate active justice, so as to prevent judicial power from arbitrary and abuse, so that the concept of active justice better serve for the construction of socialist legal system.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】