当代中国法官思维研究

发布时间：2018-03-28 22:34

本文选题：当代中国　切入点：法官思维　出处：《广西师范大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：“法官作为‘法律帝国的王侯’(美国法学家德沃金语)不仅直接主导着法律的运行,而且其智慧(思维)也在很大程度上决定着“中国法治”的精神气质和基本样态。”近年来,随着中国法治化建设与法官职业化建设进程的加速,我国许多学者也开始关注法官思维。如果说司法作为“社会公正的最后一道防线”,那么法官就是这最后防线的守门人。司法本身的属性要求法律能够被确定执行并且不偏不倚,司法公正很大程度决定了中国法治现代化进度,而法官作为司法裁判的主体,法官这一职业群体的活动也就成了中国法治发展的关键,法官活动,或者称之为司法裁判,从法官作为人的属性,亦或是法官作为一种特殊的职业,他们的活动是依赖其职业的思维,因此,系统地研究法官思维,揭示法官的思维的规律,进而提出法官思维培养的进路,也就显得很有必要。我的研究进路是从理论的构建到实践的运用的过程。论文总共分为四章。第一章,法官思维的概念界定。通过比较分析得出有关法官思维的概念,即,法官思维是一种职业法律思维,或称之为审判思维,法官在审判活动中运用法学基础理论,以法律专门术语工具,以专业逻辑为支撑,分析、把社会问题转化成法律问题,加以判断综合认识的过程。它具有本身固有的特征,即独立性、中立性、确定性、程序性、逻辑性、公正性、保守性等典型特征。第二章,法官思维的构成要素与原则。首先,解析法官思维的构成要素,试探究法官思维的模式选择,为法官思维在实践中提供指导性路径选择。其次,探析法官思维的一般规律与法官思维在司法实践中的运用,指明法官思维与司法裁判技术的联系。第三章,当代中国法官思维分析。分析与总结当代中国法官思维的特色与不足,挖掘影响法官思维的深层次影响因素,从而对我国法官思维的现状有充分的认识。第四章,完善当代中国法官思维的进路。在当代中国法官思维分析的基础上,我们直面法官思维培养的紧迫性,并针对不足尝试提出了完善我国法官思维的进路,揭示了完善法官思维培养的路径选择。
[Abstract]:"the judge, as the king of the legal empire (Dworkin, American jurist), not only directly dominates the operation of the law, but also determines to a great extent the mental temperament and basic appearance of the 'Chinese rule of law' by its wisdom (thinking)." With the acceleration of the construction of the rule of law and the professionalization of judges in China, Many scholars in our country have also begun to pay attention to the thinking of judges. If justice is regarded as the "last line of defense of social justice", then the judge is the gatekeeper of this last line of defense. The nature of justice itself requires that the law be determined to be enforced and impartial. To a great extent, judicial justice determines the progress of the modernization of the rule of law in China. As the main body of judicial adjudication, the activities of this professional group of judges have become the key to the development of the rule of law in China. The activities of judges, or called judicial decisions, have become the key to the development of China's rule of law. From the attribute of judge as human, or judge as a kind of special profession, their activities depend on the thinking of their profession. Therefore, it is necessary to study judge's thinking systematically and reveal the law of judge's thinking. Furthermore, it is necessary to put forward the way to cultivate the thinking of judges. My research approach is a process from the construction of theory to the application of practice. The first chapter is the definition of judge's thinking. Through comparative analysis, the author obtains the concept of judge's thinking, that is, judge's thinking is a kind of professional legal thinking, or called trial thinking, and judges use the basic theory of law in judicial activities. By means of specialized legal terminology, supported by professional logic, the author analyzes, transforms social problems into legal problems, and judges the process of comprehensive understanding. It has its own inherent characteristics, namely independence, neutrality, certainty, procedure, etc. Logic, fairness, conservatism and other typical characteristics. The second chapter, the elements and principles of the judge's thinking. First, analyze the elements of the judge's thinking, try to explore the judge's thinking mode of choice, for judges' thinking in practice to provide a guiding path choice. This paper probes into the general law of the judge's thinking and the application of the judge's thinking in the judicial practice, and points out the connection between the judge's thinking and the judicial judgment technology. In the third chapter, the author analyzes and summarizes the characteristics and shortcomings of the thinking of judges in contemporary China, and excavates the factors that affect the thinking of judges, so as to have a full understanding of the present situation of the thinking of judges in our country. On the basis of the analysis of the thinking of judges in contemporary China, we face the urgency of the training of the thinking of judges, and put forward the way to perfect the thinking of judges in our country. It reveals the choice of ways to perfect the training of judges' thinking.
【学位授予单位】：广西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】