冲突与融合：公众舆论和量刑关系研究

发布时间：2018-03-29 04:32

本文选题：公众舆论　切入点：量刑　出处：《中国社会科学院研究生院》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着传媒和资讯的发达以及人们对公共事件的关注度逐渐加强,一些刑事案件难以避免地进入公众视野,并且接受公众的评判。公众有权对司法领域的事件发表看法,且公众对司法案件的关注能够实现公众对司法的监督,培育公众的法律意识和法律理念。但是,公众舆论与量刑之间也存在着冲突,这是因为公众舆论与司法裁判之间在话语体系、目标追求等方面存在不一致造成的。司法以法律理性追求法律正义,而公众更多地追求朴素正义,双方存在严重的话语体系冲突。公众舆论在一些社会热点案件中往往表达对量刑结果的不满,甚至要求对案件进行改判,从而对司法机关构成强大的压力,导致公众舆论会对司法产生巨大的影响。如在许霆案、孙伟铭案、邓玉娇案中都表现出了舆论对司法的巨大影响力。公众舆论对司法的压力即可能产生正面影响,也可能产生负面影响,甚至损害司法独立审判原则,造成公众舆论与量刑的冲突。事实上,公众舆论与量刑的冲突能够化解,公众舆论与量刑甚至能够相互融合。本文从阐述公众舆论和量刑的基本内核入手,通过分析公众舆论与量刑的冲突及成因,提出了公众舆论与量刑的融合及对策。从公众舆论对量刑的影响机制来看,首先表现为公众在信息获取阶段出现了信息失真,其次表现为媒体或者公众的一些观念误导了人们的看法,最终汇聚成为舆论,通过反馈机制对司法机关构成巨大的压力。司法机关和司法机关工作人员极易受到公众舆论的影响。由于公众舆论可能会对司法产生负面影响,因此需要积极化解两者之间的冲突。化解公众舆论与量刑的冲突,是增强司法权威,消除官民冲突的重要手段。因此,需要从三方角度展开,即媒体、法院以及公众三个层面进行把握:对媒体来说,应该坚持客观、公正、理性,向公众传递全面、客观的信息,避免误导公众;对法院来说,应该公开、公正、互动,主动接受公众的监督,且在案件审理中公开公正,实现法律正义;对公众来说,理解、信任、包容,在发表言论的时候体现公民的理性。通过媒体、法院以及公众三方主体之间的积极互动与协调,以包容、理性的视角审视法律问题,能够有效地化解公众舆论与量刑之间的冲突,发挥公众对司法的积极监督意义,实现舆论与司法的融合。
[Abstract]:With the development of the media and information and the increasing attention paid to public events, some criminal cases inevitably enter the public eye and be judged by the public. The public has the right to express their views on events in the judicial field. And the public attention to judicial cases can realize the public supervision of justice, cultivate the public legal consciousness and legal idea. However, there is also a conflict between public opinion and sentencing. This is due to the inconsistency between public opinion and judicial decision in the system of discourse and the pursuit of objectives. Justice pursues legal justice based on legal rationality, while the public pursues simple justice more often. There is a serious conflict between the two sides in the discourse system. Public opinion often expresses dissatisfaction with the sentencing result in some hot social cases, and even demands a revision of the case, thus creating a strong pressure on the judicial organs. Public opinion will have a tremendous impact on the administration of justice. For example, in the case of Xu Ting, Sun Weiming and Deng Yujiao, the public opinion has shown its tremendous influence on the administration of justice. The pressure of public opinion on the administration of justice is likely to have a positive impact. It may even damage the principle of judicial independence and cause conflict between public opinion and sentencing. In fact, the conflict between public opinion and sentencing can be resolved, and public opinion and sentencing can even be merged. This paper begins with the basic kernel of public opinion and sentencing, and analyzes the conflict and causes of public opinion and sentencing. This paper puts forward the fusion of public opinion and sentencing and its countermeasures. From the perspective of the influence mechanism of public opinion on sentencing, the first manifestation is that the public has information distortion in the stage of obtaining information. Secondly, some ideas of the media or the public misled people's views and eventually converged into public opinion. Great pressure on the judiciary through feedback mechanisms. The judiciary and its staff are highly vulnerable to the influence of public opinion... as public opinion may have a negative impact on the administration of justice, Therefore, it is necessary to actively resolve the conflict between the two. To resolve the conflict between public opinion and sentencing is an important means to strengthen judicial authority and eliminate conflicts between officials and people. Therefore, it needs to be launched from a tripartite perspective, that is, the media, The court and the public should grasp it at three levels: to the media, it should adhere to the objective, fair, rational, comprehensive and objective information to the public to avoid misleading the public; to the court, it should be open, fair and interactive. Take the initiative to accept the supervision of the public, and in the trial of cases open and fair, to achieve legal justice; for the public, understanding, trust, tolerance, in the expression of public opinion reflect the rationality of citizens. Through the media, The positive interaction and coordination between the court and the public tripartite subjects can effectively resolve the conflict between public opinion and sentencing and give full play to the positive supervision significance of the public to the administration of justice by examining the legal issues from an inclusive and rational perspective. Realize the fusion of public opinion and justice.
【学位授予单位】：中国社会科学院研究生院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926

【相似文献】