浅议中国民事诉讼中的司法能动性理念

发布时间：2018-04-12 22:04

本文选题：司法能动性 + 司法克制　；参考：《华中科技大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：在民事诉讼法领域,司法克制与司法能动两种释法哲学的争论由来已久。前者,重点实现法律价值中的安定和权威;后者,重点保障法律价值中的经济和效率。当今,纯粹适用司法克制或纯粹适用司法能动必然造成当事人过分积极或法院过分积极,均于解决诉讼爆炸、诉讼拖延、诉讼突袭、诉讼欺诈、诉权滥用等难点问题无益,而两种司法哲学的适度融合已经成为英美法系、大陆法系的共识。英美法系中,司法能动主义早已成为里程碑式的学说流派,其主张弱化遵循先例原则。大陆法系中,司法能动性理念源远流长,强调法院、法官在民事案件的诉讼过程中发挥其主动性、服务性和高效性以更为彻底、有效的化解纠纷。在我国,能动司法理念于2009年8月正式由最高人民法院系统性提出。本文共分五部分,依次分析了司法能动性的研究现状、涵义、具体内容、必要性和可行性、未来完善的建议。第一部分为绪论,指明了司法能动性的研究现状;第二部分将司法能动性与司法能动理念进行了比较解读,并梳理了司法能动理念的发展渊源。按照诉讼的纵向顺序依次总结了审理阶段的司法能动性改造、执行阶段的司法能动性改造。第三部分重点分析了司法能动性的具体内容。第四部分重点解决对司法能动性理念的必要性和可行性分析。第五部分,笔者提出了关于未来如何丰富和完善司法能动性理念的具体意见。总之,能动司法理念不仅体现了世界各国诉讼法的一般规律,还反映了我国“服务于大局、服务于人民”理念在特殊历史时期的需要;不仅成为我国应对国际金融危机的有效措施,还将在我国构建和谐主义诉讼模式的道路上发挥重大作用。
[Abstract]:In the field of civil procedure, judicial restraint and judicial activism of two kinds of interpretation of the law philosophy. The former long-standing, focused on the realization of the legal value of the stability and authority; the latter, focus on the protection of legal value and economic efficiency. Nowadays, pure judicial restraint or purely for judicial activism will inevitably lead to overly positive or positive over the court party all, to solve the explosion of litigation, litigation delay, litigation surprise, litigation fraud, abuse of litigation difficult problems such as useless, and two moderate integration of judicial philosophy has become the consensus of the Anglo American law system, continental law system.
In the Anglo American legal system, judicial activism has become a milepost type doctrines, which advocates weakening of the doctrine of precedent. In continental law system, judicial activism has a long history, it is the court, to play their initiative in the process of the judge in civil cases, and efficient service to more thoroughly, to resolve disputes effectively in. In China, the concept of judicial activism in August 2009 officially by the Supreme People's court system is put forward.
This paper is divided into five parts, analyzes the research situation, the meaning of judicial activism, the specific content, necessity and feasibility, suggestions for future improvement. The first part is the introduction, pointed out the research status quo of judicial activism; the second part of the judicial activism and judicial activism concept of comparative study and sort out the development the origin of judicial activism. In accordance with the concept of litigation are summed up the vertical order of judicial activism in the trial stage of the reform, implementation of judicial activism in the transformation stage. The third part focuses on the specific content of judicial activism. The fourth part focuses on the necessity and feasibility of judicial activism. In the fifth part, the author puts forward about the specific advice on how to enrich and perfect the judicial activism in the future.
In short, the concept of judicial activism not only reflects the general law of the world litigation law, but also reflects China's "serve the overall situation, serve the people" concept in the special historical period; not only become the effective measures of China's response to international financial crisis, but also play an important role in China's construction of a harmonious pattern of litigation on the road.

【学位授予单位】：华中科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D925.1;D926.2

【引证文献】