以人为本的司法理念

发布时间：2018-04-28 06:08

本文选题：以人为本 + 司法理念　；参考：《山东大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：在法治社会的建构进程中,司法理念发挥着基础性和导向性的作用。本文着眼于“以人为本”和“司法理念”两个基本要素,首先定义了“以人为本的司法理念”的内涵和外延,深刻揭示其具体特质,进而论证了该理念对中国社会及司法实践的现实意义,即“为什么要实行以人为本的司法理念”,最后围绕“如何实现以人为本的司法理念”这一主题,力求从主体因素、制度因素和法律方法因素三个方面寻求实现以人为本的司法理念的基本路径,并分别提出了建议。本文以中国的司法现实为研究对象,通过运用文献研究的方法、概念分析的方法、比较研究的方法及经验总结的方法来实现司法过程中的以人为本。从“小处着手,大处着眼”,将司法现实与以人为本的司法理念进行对比分析,发现司法过程中还存在着哪些不以人为本的观念、制度及方法；将理论与经验相结合,吸取符合中国社会现实的实践经验,并对其——提出改善意见。文章的主要内容有：第一部分首先就“以人为本”和“司法理念”各自的含义作了分析和阐述,在定义以人为本的司法理念的概念的基础上分析了二者的一般关系,以及其与其他司法理念的特别之处。第二部分着重分析以及实行以人为本的司法理念的时代背景和学术背景,分别从司法价值层面,诉讼活动层面,法律方法层面分析了实行以人为本的司法理念对于中国社会和树立司法权威的意义,指出这一理念能够满足多元司法理念的共同价值追求,能够适应诉讼活动中的人性化诉求,能够推动法律方法应用于实践。第三部分将影响以人为本的司法理念的实现因素具体划分为主体因素、制度因素和法律方法因素三方面。第四部分则致力于该理念的实现。在主体因素方面,要塑造法官的理想形象,完善法官的职业人格,避免“以当事人为术”；在司法制度上,可通过建立裁判文书公开系统实现可公开的司法,通过法律职业共同体之间的互动实现可协作的司法,通过防止过度裁量、大调解实现可预见的司法,通过审判过程中法官私人利益的隐退实现可信任的司法,通过疏通民意表达的渠道实现可持续的司法；在法律方法层面,要关注法律论证方法和利益衡量方法的应用,司法论证要超越法官视角,关注控辩双方的论证,利益衡量要至少在形式上符合现有的法律规范,通过案例指导制度对利益的分类、排序及利益衡量方法的步骤加以归纳。
[Abstract]:In the construction process of the rule of law society, the judicial idea plays a basic and guiding role. This article focuses on the two basic elements of "people-oriented" and "judicial idea". First, it defines the connotation and extension of the "people-oriented judicial concept", deeply reveals its specific characteristics, and then demonstrates the concept of the Chinese society and the company. The practical significance of the practice of law is, "why should we carry out the people-oriented judicial idea", and finally focus on the theme of "how to realize the people-oriented judicial concept", and seek the basic path to realize the people-oriented principle from three aspects: the main factors, the institutional factors and the legal methods and methods, and put forward the suggestions respectively.
This article takes the judicial reality of China as the research object, through the method of using literature research, the method of concept analysis, the method of comparative study and the method of experience summary to realize the people-oriented in the judicial process. From the "small place, the big focus", the judicial reality and the human based judicial idea are compared and analyzed, and the judicature is found. In the course of the process, there are some ideas, systems and methods that are not people-oriented, combining theory with experience, absorbing practical experience in conformity with the reality of Chinese society, and making suggestions for improvement. The main contents of this article are:
The first part of the first part of the "people-oriented" and "judicial concept" of the meaning of each analysis and exposition, on the basis of the definition of the concept of people-oriented judicial concept of the general relationship between the two, and the special features of the other judicial ideas. The second part focuses on the analysis and implementation of the people-oriented judicial concept. The background of the times and the academic background, from the judicial value level, the litigation activity level, the legal method level, analyzes the significance of the judicial idea of people based on the Chinese society and the establishment of judicial authority. It points out that this idea can meet the common value pursuit of multiple judicial ideas and can adapt to the human demands in the litigation activities. In the third part, the third part divides the realization factors of the people-oriented judicial idea into the main factor, the system factor and the legal method factor three aspects. The fourth part is devoted to the realization of the idea. In the main factors, we should shape the ideal image of the judge and improve the professional personality of the judge. To avoid the "litigant", in the judicial system, the judicial system can be realized through the establishment of the open system of the referee documents, and the cooperative judicature can be realized through the interaction between the legal profession community, and the foreseeable judicature can be realized through the prevention of excessive discretion and the great mediation, and the private interests of the judges in the trial process can be realized. The justice of trust is to realize the sustainable judicature through the channel of public opinion expression; at the legal level, we should pay attention to the application of the method of legal argumentation and the method of interest measurement. The judicial argumentation should transcend the judge's perspective and pay attention to the argument of both the prosecution and the defense. The measure of interest should be at least in the form of the existing legal norms and through the guidance of the case. The system summarizes the steps of interest classification, ranking and interest measurement.

【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】