我国法官责任追究制度的完善
发布时间:2018-05-02 12:16
本文选题:法官 + 责任追究 ; 参考:《广东财经大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:司法责任制是本轮司法改革的核心和关键,因而备受瞩目。法官责任追究制度作为司法责任制的一个重要组成部分,是权力与责任统一的体现以及法官独立行使审判权的保障。为了使法官更好地履行捍卫社会公正与正义的职责,能够依法独立地行使审判权,就必须对现行的法官责任追究制度进行改善。当前,存在不少的法律法规或司法文件对此进行规定,但法官责任追究制度仍旧存在缺陷:没有独立的责任追究主体,追究程序带有行政化倾向,责任范围庞杂且缺乏统一性和系统性等。这导致了法官责任追究制度在实践中没有收到应有的实效。通过对四个国家的法官责任追究制度的研究分析,归纳出一些成功的经验作为借鉴,在遵循司法改革的规律和要求下,建议修改《法官法》,建立专门独立的责任追究机构,制定科学化的责任追究程序,合理确定责任范围,限制追究时效,以求完善我国现有的法官责任追究制度。
[Abstract]:Judicial responsibility system is the core and key of this round of judicial reform. As an important part of the judicial responsibility system, the system of investigating the judge's responsibility is the embodiment of the unity of power and responsibility and the guarantee of the judge's independent exercise of judicial power. In order to enable judges to perform their duty of safeguarding social justice and justice and to exercise judicial power independently according to law, it is necessary to improve the current system of investigating judges' responsibilities. At present, there are many laws and regulations or judicial documents to provide for this, but there are still defects in the system of investigating the responsibility of judges: there is no independent subject of accountability, and the investigation procedure has an administrative tendency. The scope of responsibility is complex and lacks uniformity and systematicness. This led to the system of accountability of judges in practice did not receive due effect. Through the research and analysis of the system of investigating judges' responsibility in four countries, some successful experiences are summed up for reference. Under the rules and requirements of judicial reform, it is suggested to amend the Law of judges and establish a special independent accountability institution. In order to perfect the existing system of investigating the responsibility of judges, we should establish a scientific procedure for the investigation of responsibility, reasonably determine the scope of responsibility, and limit the limitation of investigation.
【学位授予单位】:广东财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D926.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王小光;李琴;;我国法官惩戒制度二元模式的思考与完善[J];法律适用;2016年12期
2 公丕潜;;司法责任制视域下基层人民法院独立审判的困境与出路[J];知与行;2016年07期
3 陈瑞华;;法院改革的中国经验[J];政法论坛;2016年04期
4 郑曦;;司法责任制背景下英国法官薪酬和惩戒制度及其启示[J];法律适用;2016年07期
5 周长军;;司法责任制改革中的法官问责——兼评《关于完善人民法院司法责任制的若干意见》[J];法学家;2016年03期
6 王迎龙;;司法责任制理论问题探析——基于“两高”关于完善司法责任制的两份意见[J];社会科学家;2016年06期
7 王伦刚;刘思达;;从实体问责到程序之治——中国法院错案追究制运行的实证考察[J];法学家;2016年02期
8 朱孝清;;错案责任追究与豁免[J];中国法学;2016年02期
9 詹建红;;我国法官惩戒制度的困境与出路[J];法学评论;2016年02期
10 金泽刚;;司法改革背景下的司法责任制[J];东方法学;2015年06期
,本文编号:1833874
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1833874.html

