论非诉讼调解与民事诉讼之关系

发布时间：2018-05-27 06:05

本文选题：非诉讼调解 + 民事诉讼　；参考：《南昌大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：我国的多元化纠纷解决机制的研究和发展从独立的理论研究阶段逐步上升到实践大演练的阶段。其中在具有中国特色的法治社会建设中,非诉讼调解机制特别是人民调解制度作为多元化纠纷解决机制中的主要力量,成为当前理论乃至实践中高度关注和力图建设健全的重大问题。但在提高非诉讼调解制度法制地位的同时,其架构也必须符合多元化纠纷解决机制的价值选择性及互补性,所以如何做好非诉调解和诉讼的衔接和协调,是本文试图研究的重要课题。非诉讼调解与审判是相互依存、优势互补的关系。但事实上除法院调解外,其他多元调解机制实践中却运行不畅,化解矛盾能力依然较弱。因组织不健全和调解过程、方法有缺陷等问题,其解纷能力呈急剧下降趋势,造成人民调解解纷机制疲软无力。正是由于在多元化社会下纠纷解决机制的职能分配不均,造成大量纠纷涌入法院,不仅增加了法院负担,也使矛盾难以迅速地化解,增加了社会不安定因素。因此促进诉讼调解与非诉调解的良性互动,对于推进以司法为主导的多元纠纷解决体系的健康发展,维护社会和谐稳定具有重要意义。因此,在全球倡议多元化纠纷解决机制的大背景下以及国内急需稳定社会秩序,摆脱诉讼滥用困境的情况下,我国对多元化纠纷解决方式中诉讼及调解等方式应抱有一个清醒的认识,不应盲目强调二者的取舍,应挖掘我国传统非诉讼民事调解的精髓,并借鉴非诉讼纠纷解决机制的发展成果,辩证的承认非诉讼调解和诉讼二者存在的合理性,并寻求适应现代化民事诉讼制度的制度衔接的构建,为多元化纠纷解决机制体系的建立提供最坚实的理论基础。
[Abstract]:The research and development of the diversified dispute resolution mechanism in China has gradually increased from the stage of independent theoretical research to the stage of practical exercise. In the construction of a legal society with Chinese characteristics, the non-litigation mediation mechanism, especially the people's mediation system, is the main force in the pluralistic dispute resolution mechanism. Become the current theory and practice of high concern and strive to build a sound major issue. However, while improving the legal status of the non-litigation mediation system, its structure must also conform to the value selectivity and complementarity of the pluralistic dispute resolution mechanism, so how to do a good job in the connection and coordination between non-litigation mediation and litigation, It is an important subject in this paper. Non-litigation mediation and trial are interdependent and complementary. But in fact, in addition to court mediation, the practice of other multi-mediation mechanism is not smooth, the ability to resolve contradictions is still weak. Because the organization is not perfect, the mediation process, the method has the defect and so on, its resolving ability presents the sharp decline tendency, causes the people to mediate the dispute to resolve the mechanism to be weak. It is precisely due to the uneven distribution of the functions of the dispute settlement mechanism in a pluralistic society that a large number of disputes flood into the court, which not only increases the burden of the court, but also makes the contradiction difficult to resolve quickly and increases the social instability factor. Therefore, it is of great significance to promote the positive interaction between litigation mediation and non-litigation mediation to promote the healthy development of the multi-party dispute resolution system, which is dominated by the judiciary, and to maintain social harmony and stability. Therefore, in the context of the diversified dispute resolution mechanism of the Global Initiative and the urgent need to stabilize the social order and extricate itself from the dilemma of litigation abuse, In our country, we should have a clear understanding of litigation and mediation in the pluralistic dispute resolution, and should not blindly emphasize the trade-off between the two, and should excavate the essence of traditional non-litigation civil mediation in our country. And draw lessons from the development of non-litigation dispute resolution mechanism, dialectically admit the rationality of non-litigation mediation and litigation, and seek to adapt to the construction of modern civil litigation system. To provide the most solid theoretical basis for the establishment of diversified dispute resolution mechanism system.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926;D925.1

【相似文献】