社会管理创新中的司法行为与裁判文书公开

发布时间：2018-05-27 11:02

本文选题：社会管理 + 司法行为　；参考：《西南财经大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：社会管理的目标是为追求一种有序的秩序,维持社会稳定,尊重保障人权,从而达致善治。司法过程及其判决是最生动、最直接、最丰富的实践。每一件引起社会关注的案件,其判决对对民众的心理及行为、对社会舆论及道德、对社会组织的行为规范及行业规则、对政府机关的行为选择及履行服务管理职能,以及对司法机关本身都会造成诸多影响抑或重大影响。如“彭宇案”、“刘涌案”、“许霆案”、“邓玉娇案”、“药家鑫案”、“李昌奎案”、“夏俊峰案”等,都显示出司法行为及其裁判对于国家加强社会管理及其创新产生了重要影响。司法行为中,裁判文书作为判决的最终产物公开,逐渐引起学者和法律实践工作者们的重视。总之,公开的裁判文书在逐渐影响着社会管理的方式。然而,如何使间接的司法判决通过裁判文书公开传递至社会秩序,有效地实现社会的创新管理?这个问题值得深思。基于此,本文分为包括导论的四个部分对上述问题予以讨论：导论通过分析现行我国社会管理中遭遇的新问题,发现司法裁判的社会功能,从而提出文章所关注的问题和研究对象,同时对相关理论研究进行评述,以找到本文的研究起点。第二部分,首先讨论司法运作的不同环节,包括立案、审理、裁判与执行所具有的社会管理功能；在此基础上研究司法行为与社会管理创新之间的关系；最后探讨裁判结果的两种处理方式,即判决与调解所具有的社会管理作用。第三部分,主要立足于使司法裁判与社会管理创新的联动与粘合。首先,行政管理是传统的社会管理模式,判决对行政权力具有确定与限制的作用;其次,裁判能对社会进行规训,是对社会管理的冲击,对社会道德的引导,对社会行为的规制；最后,本部分探讨判决形成与司法行为的激励与约束,判决倒逼司法行为表达方式发生了变化。第四部分,在上述部分论述的基础上,探讨如何通过裁判文书的公开实现社会管理创新。首先裁判文书的公开关系社会信息公开与社会公正,是社会管理创新的重要方面；其次是讨论裁判文书的行为导向；最后对裁判文书公开与裁判过程公开的联动提出建议。本文创新之处在于以社会管理创新为背景,探讨司法行为及裁判文书公开,较好地解释三者的关系,提出裁判文书公开是司法间接对社会管理创新发挥作用的重要途径,并且据此提出裁判文书公开与社会管理创新联动的具体建议。
[Abstract]:The goal of social management is to achieve good governance by pursuing an orderly order, maintaining social stability, respecting and protecting human rights. Judicial process and its judgment are the most vivid, direct and abundant practice. In each case of social concern, its judgment is directed at the psychology and behavior of the public, on public opinion and morality, on the norms of conduct and trade rules of social organizations, on the choice of conduct of government organs and on the performance of service management functions. As well as the judiciary itself will have a lot of impact or significant impact. For example, "Peng Yu case", "Liu Yong case", "Xu Ting case", "Deng Yujiao case", "Yao Jiaxin case", "Li Changkui case", "Xia Junfeng case", etc. Both show that judicial behavior and its adjudication have an important impact on the strengthening of social management and innovation. As the final product of judgment, judicial documents have attracted the attention of scholars and legal practitioners. In short, open adjudication documents are gradually affecting the way of social management. However, how to make the indirect judicial decision public transmission to the social order through the adjudication document, effectively realizes the social innovation management? This question is worth pondering over. Based on this, this paper is divided into four parts including introduction to discuss the above issues: By analyzing the new problems encountered in the current social management of our country, the introduction finds out the social function of the judicial decision, and puts forward the problems and research objects concerned in the article. At the same time, it comments on the relevant theoretical studies to find the starting point of this research. The second part first discusses the different links of judicial operation, including filing, trial, adjudication and execution of the social management functions, on the basis of this research on the relationship between judicial behavior and social management innovation; Finally, the paper discusses the two ways of dealing with the adjudication result, that is, the social management function of judgment and mediation. The third part is based on the linkage and agglutination between judicial decision and social management innovation. First, the administration is the traditional social management mode, the judgment has the function of determining and restricting the administrative power; secondly, the judge can discipline the society, is the impact to the social management, the guidance to the social morals, Finally, this part discusses the formation of judgment and the incentive and restriction of judicial behavior, and the expression mode of judicial behavior is changed. The fourth part, on the basis of the above-mentioned part, discusses how to realize the innovation of social management through the publicity of adjudicative documents. First of all, the open relationship between the public adjudication documents and social justice is an important aspect of the innovation of social management; secondly, it discusses the behavioral orientation of the adjudication documents; finally, it puts forward some suggestions on the linkage between the publicity of the adjudication documents and the openness of the adjudication process. The innovation of this paper lies in taking the social management innovation as the background, probes into the judicial behavior and the judgment document publicity, explains the relationship among them, and points out that the judicial documents publicity is an important way for the judicial indirectly to play a role in the social management innovation. And accordingly puts forward the judgment document open and the social management innovation linkage concrete suggestion.
【学位授予单位】：西南财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】