能动司法的争议及规制

发布时间：2018-06-13 07:16

本文选题：能动司法 + 司法能动主义　；参考：《苏州大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：2008年以来金融危机波及世界，中国亦未能幸免，中国政府采取了一系列的政策措施“保增长”“保民生”“保稳定”。最高人民法院响应号召，提出了一个具有中国特色的司法概念——能动司法。经由最高人民法院领导倡导，能动司法已成当前各级人民法院积极奉行的司法理念，无疑也是近些年来中国司法界最耀眼的词语。但能动司法一经提出，即招致理论界和实践界巨大争论，褒贬不一，学界多有批评之意，实务界则多赞誉之词，孰是孰非，难以结论。本文在详细论述能动司法的产生背景和特点基础上，分析了司法能动主义和能动司法区别和联系。紧接着阐述关于能动司法的正当性争议，分析了实施能动司法给我国带来的危害，并就此提出了若干条约束性措施。
[Abstract]:Since 2008, the financial crisis has affected the world, and China has not been spared. The Chinese government has adopted a series of policy measures to "maintain growth", "protect people's livelihood" and "maintain stability". In response to the call, the Supreme people's Court put forward a judicial concept with Chinese characteristics-active justice. Through the leadership of the Supreme people's Court, the active administration of justice has become an active judicial concept pursued by people's courts at all levels at present, and undoubtedly the most dazzling word in Chinese judicial circles in recent years. But as soon as the active judicature is put forward, it will lead to great controversy between the theorists and the practice circles, and it is difficult to conclude that the academic circles have much criticism, and the practical circles have more words of praise, which is right and which is wrong. On the basis of discussing the background and characteristics of active judicature in detail, this paper analyzes the distinction and relation between judicial activism and active judicature. Then it expounds the controversy about the legitimacy of active justice, analyzes the harm brought by the implementation of active justice to our country, and puts forward some binding measures.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】