民意与司法应对

发布时间：2018-06-22 04:17

本文选题：民意 + 司法权威　；参考：《湘潭大学》2014年博士论文

【摘要】：近十年来，不断涌现的重大案件成为民意关注的对象，从中我们不难发现民意对于中国司法日益显著的影响力。中国正处于社会政治、经济、文化等各个方面的深刻变革之中，急剧的社会发展、经济发展和价值导向的偏差使得社会分层扩大，社会矛盾激化，从而反映到民意对于诉讼案件的热情参与之中。随着互联网时代的到来，，民意尤其是网络民意在整个司法过程中扮演着重要角色。近年来，司法也愿意贴近民意做出判决，以保护仅存的司法公信力，然而其努力并未得到期望的正面评价，司法权威和司法公信力并未得到提升。如何理解民意及其当代特质，如何把握近十年民众关注刑事案件的特点及暗含信息，如何认清民意的形成过程，如何找准民意发生的根源，以及司法机关如何在尊重民意的同时，以专业理性探究民意背后的实质因素，从而合理确定吸纳民意的边界，设置普通民众参与司法的制度化途径，设计当前司法回应民众关注案件的制度化模式，是当下我们亟需研究的重要课题。本文的逻辑线索基本按照以上问题展开，除了引言和结论部分，本文共分为七章。第一章明确了民意的基本定义与当代特质。第二章以近十年发生的民众关注刑事案件作为研究样本，对其进行了类型化分析，并总结归纳其特点和暗含的政治与社会信息。第三章借助图表分析了民意的形成过程，并探讨了在当前背景下，民意与各方的利益角力。第四章对民众热情关注司法的原因进行了思考。第五章结合长期以来关于司法应否回应民意的纷争，对于司法应当吸纳民意的理由进行了阐述。第六章提出了司法应对民意的策略。首先介绍了司法机关对待民意的基本原则，进而提出了司法应对的具体措施。第七章是关于此论题的延伸思考。从总体上，对于民意应当予以正面评价，也要警惕民意背后包含的政治和社会信息。针对司法内外不同的民意诉求，司法应采取不同的应对方式。要在坚持司法独立审判的基础上，依据制度和程序有效回应民意。司法权威的提升是缓解民意与司法冲突的根本出路。这既需要司法机关自身的努力，也需要为司法创造屏蔽外界干扰的制度保障，更需要构建全社会对司法权威的认同。
[Abstract]:In the past ten years, the public opinion has paid close attention to the emerging major cases, and it is not difficult to find that the public opinion has an increasingly significant influence on the Chinese judiciary. China is in the midst of profound changes in social politics, economy, culture, and so on. The sharp social development, the deviation of economic development and value orientation make the social stratification expand and social contradictions intensify. Thus reflects the public opinion to the lawsuit case enthusiasm participation. With the advent of the Internet era, public opinion, especially network public opinion, plays an important role in the whole judicial process. In recent years, the judiciary is willing to make judgments close to public opinion in order to protect the remaining judicial credibility. However, its efforts have not been evaluated positively as expected, and judicial authority and judicial credibility have not been promoted. How to understand public opinion and its contemporary characteristics, how to grasp the characteristics and implied information of people's concern about criminal cases in the past ten years, how to recognize the forming process of public opinion, and how to find out the root cause of public opinion. And how the judiciary, while respecting public opinion, probes into the essential factors behind public opinion with professional rationality, so as to reasonably determine the boundary of absorbing public opinion and set up an institutionalized way for ordinary people to participate in the administration of justice. It is an important task for us to design the institutional model of judicial response to cases. The logic clue of this paper is based on the above questions, except the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into seven chapters. The first chapter clarifies the basic definition of public opinion and contemporary characteristics. In the second chapter, the author takes the criminal cases that happened in the past ten years as the research samples, analyzes the types of criminal cases, and summarizes the characteristics and the implied political and social information. The third chapter analyzes the forming process of public opinion with the help of charts, and discusses the struggle between public opinion and the interests of all parties under the current background. The fourth chapter thinks about the reason why the people pay close attention to the judicature. The fifth chapter expounds the reasons why the judicature should accept public opinion according to the dispute about whether the judicature should respond to the public opinion for a long time. The sixth chapter puts forward the strategy of judicial response to public opinion. This paper first introduces the basic principles of the judiciary's treatment of public opinion, and then puts forward the concrete measures of judicial response. The seventh chapter is about the extension thinking of this thesis. On the whole, public opinion should be evaluated positively and the political and social information should be warned. According to the different demands of public opinion inside and outside the judiciary, the judicature should adopt different ways to deal with it. We should respond to public opinion according to system and procedure on the basis of independent judicial trial. The promotion of judicial authority is the fundamental way to alleviate the conflict between public opinion and judicature. This requires not only the efforts of the judicial organs themselves, but also the creation of a system to shield against external interference for the judiciary, and the construction of the whole society's recognition of the judicial authority.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】