判决书说理性研究

发布时间：2018-06-23 02:38

本文选题：法官 + 裁判　；参考：《内蒙古大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：由于深受“法典主义”思想的影响,我国司法制度表现出明显的大陆法系特点,导致了我国判决书说理性并没有形成制度,甚至判决书是否需要说理也处于长期的争论之中。我们认为,根据我国目前司法现状,判决书说理急需正当化、制度化。因为一方面判决说理是法官公开行使权力的一种方式,同时也是法官自我保护的一种选择；另一方面,说理是司法职能的内在要求,司法机关通过判决说理使当事人“心服”判决。判决书说理的正当基础也是判决书说理性研究的逻辑前提。通过分析,笔者认为应进一步强调判决书说理的重要性,进而分析了目前我国司法实践中判决书说理缺失的现状,深入挖掘其背后的原因从而提出了完善我国判决书说理的建议,希望实现从“无理”的判决到判决书“说理”的合理转变。
[Abstract]:Deeply influenced by the thought of "Codex doctrine", the judicial system of our country shows obvious characteristics of continental legal system, which leads to the fact that the rationality of judgment theory has not formed a system in our country, and even whether or not the reasoning of judgment is necessary is also in the long debate. We believe that, according to the current judicial situation in our country, judgment reasoning urgently needs to be justified and institutionalized. On the one hand, judgment reasoning is a way for judges to exercise their power openly, while it is also a choice for judges to protect themselves; on the other hand, reasoning is an inherent requirement of judicial functions. The judicial authority justifies the judgment of the party concerned. The legitimate basis of judgment reasoning is also the logical premise of the rational study of judgment theory. Through analysis, the author thinks that the importance of judgment reasoning should be further emphasized, and then analyzes the current situation of the lack of judgment reasoning in judicial practice in our country. In order to realize the reasonable transformation from "unreasonable" judgment to "reasoning", the author puts forward the suggestion of perfecting the judgment reasoning in our country by digging into the reasons behind it.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D926.13

【参考文献】