黑龙江省非法集资案件调查研究

发布时间：2018-06-24 03:12

本文选题：非法集资 + 非法吸收公众存款　；参考：《黑龙江大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：近年来，由于非法集资案件涉及情况复杂，实践中检察机关在办理此类案件过程中遇到诸如犯罪性质认定较难把握、收集、固定证据难、易出现追诉漏犯以及检察机关如何才能更好地开展审查起诉工作等方面难于把握的法律问题和实践操作问题。因此，有必要从检察实务的角度，对我省近年来检察机关办理的非法集资案件进行调查研究，以期为我省检察机关今后处理此类案件提供借鉴。本文第一章对黑龙江省检察机关办理非法集资案件的基本情况及主要特点进行了总结和归纳。本文第二章分析了黑龙江省检察机关办理非法集资犯罪案件中存在的主要问题。这些问题主要体现在六方面：部分案件对罪与非罪,此罪与彼罪把握存在问题；对单位犯罪中其他直接责任人员范围把握不准；对中介人是否追诉把握不准；对在非法集资中获利出局人员的非法所得难以进行追缴；追诉范围不统一，存在漏犯的可能；非法集资犯罪案件的收集、固定证据较困难，案件退补率较高。本文第三章从检察实务中所存在的主要问题出发，，对办理非法集资案件提出了相关意见和建议。本章第一节对非法集资案件的相关法律问题提出适用意见，主要是：应当明确界定“社会不特定对象”，正确把握非法集资的界限；准确区分非法吸收公众存款罪与集资诈骗罪；正确把握单位犯罪中具体实施犯罪并起较大作用的人员界定标准；明确追究中介人刑事责任的范畴；区分情况对于获利的出局人违法利益进行收缴。为了更好地解决在非法集资案件中追诉范围不统一、收集、固定证据较困难，被害人损失难以挽回等问题，本章第二节就司法实践操作中应着重把握的问题及完善相关工作机制提出建议，主要是：构建对非法集资案件的证据收集体系，提高检察机关办案质量。要明确非法集资案件所涉各罪的证明要点，构建非法集资犯罪所涉各罪的证据框架，进一步夯实审查起诉的证据基础；正确运用宽严相济刑事政策，实现法律效果和社会效果的有机统一。通过把握宽严相济形势政策，严格区分罪与非罪、重罪与轻罪、此罪与彼罪，做好对非法集资犯罪分子的分化瓦解；加强部门之间的协调配合，建立处理非法集资案件联动机制。要建立健全与相关行政监管部门之间的信息通报制度、与侦查监督部门的诉侦监督机制、充分利用公诉引导侦查工作机制、建立健全与法院之间的协商机制，确保办案的质量和效果；切实保护被害人合法权益，努力促进社会和谐稳定。
[Abstract]:In recent years, due to the complexity of cases involving illegal fund-raising, in practice, procuratorial organs have encountered difficulties in handling such cases as determining the nature of the crime, collecting and fixing evidence. It is difficult to grasp the legal and practical problems in prosecution and omission and how the procuratorial organs can better carry out the examination and prosecution work. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate and study the illegal fund-raising cases handled by procuratorial organs in our province in recent years from the point of view of procuratorial practice, in order to provide reference for the procuratorial organs to deal with such cases in the future. The first chapter summarizes the basic situation and main characteristics of the procuratorial organ in Heilongjiang province. The second chapter analyzes the main problems existing in the procuratorial organs of Heilongjiang Province in handling illegal fund-raising crime cases. These problems are mainly reflected in six aspects: some cases of crime and non-crime, this crime and that crime grasp the existing problems; It is difficult to recover the illegal gains of the people who profit out in the illegal fund-raising; the scope of prosecution is not uniform and there is the possibility of omission; the collection of illegal fund-raising crime cases is difficult to collect fixed evidence and the recovery rate of cases is higher. In the third chapter, the author puts forward some opinions and suggestions on handling illegal fund-raising cases from the point of view of the main problems in procuratorial practice. The first section of this chapter puts forward the applicable opinions on the relevant legal issues in the case of illegal fund-raising, mainly as follows: we should clearly define the "social non-specific object" and correctly grasp the limits of illegal fund-raising; Distinguish between the crime of illegally absorbing public deposits and the crime of collecting funds accurately; correctly grasp the defining standard of the personnel who carry out the crime and play a greater role in the crime of unit crime; make clear the scope of investigating the criminal responsibility of the intermediary; Distinguish the situation for the profit of the outout illegal interests of the collection. In order to better solve the problems of the inconsistent scope of prosecution in illegal fund-raising cases, the difficulty of collecting and fixing evidence, and the irreparable loss of victims, The second section of this chapter puts forward some suggestions on the problems that should be grasped in judicial practice and the improvement of relevant working mechanism, mainly as follows: to construct the evidence collection system of illegal fund-raising cases and to improve the quality of handling cases by procuratorial organs. It is necessary to make clear the main points of proof of each crime involved in the case of illegal fund-raising, to construct a framework of evidence for each crime involved in the crime of illegal fund-raising, to further consolidate the evidentiary basis for the examination and prosecution of the crime, and to correctly apply the criminal policy of combining leniency and severity with punishment. Realize the organic unification of legal effect and social effect. By grasping the policy of combining leniency and strict punishment, strictly distinguishing between crimes and crimes, felonies and misdemeanours, and doing a good job in dividing and disintegrating the criminal elements of illegal fund-raising; and strengthening coordination and coordination among the departments. To establish a linkage mechanism for handling illegal fund-raising cases. It is necessary to establish and improve the information notification system with the relevant administrative supervision departments, and the investigation supervision mechanism with the investigation supervision departments, make full use of public prosecution to guide the investigation work mechanism, and establish and improve the consultation mechanism with the courts. Ensure the quality and effect of handling cases, protect the legitimate rights and interests of victims and strive to promote social harmony and stability.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D924.33;D926.3

【参考文献】