当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 司法论文 >

朝阳市人民法院内部监督制度改进研究

发布时间:2018-07-08 20:57

  本文选题:朝阳市人民法院 + 审判权 ; 参考:《大连理工大学》2012年硕士论文


【摘要】:依法治国是世界各国对历史的总结,也是现实发展的需要。要做到司法治国就要做好司法工作,而要做好司法工作,就离不开对司法的监督。对司法的监督一是需要行之有效的外部监督,二是需要司法的内部监督。只有内外监督很好地结合,才能充分发挥监督的效果。具体到法院系统而言,司法的内部监督就是人民法院的内部监督。 目前,朝阳市人民法院和全国大多数人民法院存在的基本问题是司法质量不高和腐败现象时有发生,这说明一方面是对法院的外部监督不够到位,另一方面也说明法院的内部监督机制不完善,内部监督部门设置不够合理,监督功能没有得到充分发挥,导致法院审判质量不高和司法腐败没有及时得到纠正。因此,本文试图通过对比苏联模式、大陆法系模式、英美法系模式和我国法院内部监督的实践基础,找出其内部监督的优势和启迪,以及结合笔者在朝阳市两级法院实际工作中面临的问题,从审判职能监督和行政职能监督两方面分析朝阳市法院内部监督机制的现状,并对存在的问题进行查找,结合国外内的启示和实际案例的分析,探讨如何进一步改进朝阳市法院的内部监督机制,如何进一步促使内部监督良好的运行,从而提高司法质量和防止腐败,进一步促进朝阳市人民法院的审判权在合法公正的轨道下运行,进一步为朝阳市法院的发展和改革提供理论支持和技术支持。
[Abstract]:Governing the country according to law is the summary of history and the need of development in the world. The administration of justice must be done well, and judicial supervision is indispensable to the administration of justice. Judicial supervision requires effective external supervision and internal judicial supervision. Only the good combination of internal and external supervision, we can give full play to the effect of supervision. Specifically to the court system, the internal supervision of the judiciary is the internal supervision of the people's court. At present, the basic problems existing in the Chaoyang Municipal people's Court and most of the national people's courts are that the judicial quality is not high and corruption occurs from time to time. This shows that, on the one hand, the external supervision of the court is not in place enough. On the other hand, it also shows that the internal supervision mechanism of the court is not perfect, the establishment of the internal supervision department is not reasonable, and the supervision function has not been given full play, resulting in the court trial quality is not high and the judicial corruption has not been corrected in time. Therefore, this paper tries to find out the advantages and enlightenment of the internal supervision by comparing the Soviet model, the civil law system model, the common law system model and the practical basis of the court internal supervision in our country. Combined with the problems faced by the author in the actual work of the Chaoyang Municipal Court, this paper analyzes the present situation of the internal supervision mechanism of the court in Chaoyang City from the aspects of judicial function supervision and administrative function supervision, and finds out the existing problems. Combining with the enlightenment and practical case analysis of foreign countries, this paper discusses how to further improve the internal supervision mechanism of the court of Chaoyang City and how to further promote the good operation of internal supervision, thereby improving the quality of the judiciary and preventing corruption. It will further promote the judicial power of the Chaoyang Municipal people's Court under the orbit of legality and justice, and provide theoretical and technical support for the development and reform of the court in Chaoyang City.
【学位授予单位】:大连理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D926.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 廖俊萍;;德国法院体系探微[J];当代经理人;2006年07期

2 邓思清;论审判监督的理论基础[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2003年03期

3 张_",贺少锋;论人民法院内部监督机制的完善[J];法律适用;2003年07期

4 梁三利;郭明;;法院管理模式比较——基于对英国、德国、法国的考察[J];长江师范学院学报;2010年01期

5 薛阿平,姚旭斌;从监督走向制约——法院内部审判监督制度改革初探[J];法学;1999年09期

6 王振亮;;试论我国审判监督制度[J];法制与经济(下旬);2011年01期

7 柳宗华;齐云飞;;我国法院体制改革的思考[J];法制与社会;2007年10期

8 欧阳建涛;;对法院上、下级之间工作协调制约的思考[J];法制与社会;2010年29期

9 尹泽海;论法官职务监督与法官独立[J];河北科技大学学报(社会科学版);2005年01期

10 袁祖望;权力制衡理论与国家反腐败机制[J];暨南学报(人文科学与社会科学版);2004年05期



本文编号:2108715

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2108715.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户415f5***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com