论社会情理与媒体监督维度下的法官独立——兼评德国法域下法官独立及其启示

发布时间：2018-07-17 07:21

【摘要】：司法活动是一个价值判断过程,具有抽象性,因为法律并不会为争议提供唯一解决方案,法官必须在社会情理场与媒体监督场两大维度下,依据一定方法对法律规范加以解释和适用,恪守法官的内心独立,保障社会公正。德国基本法97条是法官实质独立和身份独立的宪法保障,法官的内心独立也被看作是法治国的基本原则,援引97条解读法官的内心独立是德国学界的基本共识。面对来自社会情理场和媒体监督场的影响,德国法强调法官遵从法律的义务,在遴选环节注重考察法官候选人的人格与个性,并赋予法官内心独立以宪法职责,以保证法官面对各种干扰时保持内心独立。我国保障法官审判独立和身份独立的各项制度还亟待完善,德国的经验对我国法官制度的建设有着重要启示。
[Abstract]:Judicial activity is a process of value judgment, which is abstract, because the law does not provide the only solution to the dispute, the judge must be in the social field and the media supervision field two dimensions. According to certain methods to interpret and apply the legal norms, abide by the inner independence of judges and ensure social justice. Article 97 of the German basic Law is the constitutional guarantee of the substantive independence and identity independence of judges, and the inner independence of judges is also regarded as the basic principle of governing the country by law. It is the basic consensus of German academic circles to invoke 97 articles to interpret the internal independence of judges. In the face of the influence from the social field and the media supervision field, German law emphasizes the obligation of the judge to obey the law, pays attention to the personality and personality of the judge candidate in the selection process, and endows the judge with the constitutional duty of inner independence. In order to ensure that judges in the face of all kinds of interference to maintain internal independence. The system of ensuring the independence of judge trial and independence of status in our country needs to be perfected urgently. The experience of Germany has important enlightenment to the construction of judge system in our country.
【作者单位】：上海金融学院法律系;
【分类号】：D951.6;DD916.2;G206

【参考文献】