我国律师保密制度研究
[Abstract]:The lawyer secrecy system refers to the personal privacy, trade secrets and state secrets that lawyers have come into contact with in the course of their practice, Lawyers have the obligation to make public at will the secrets and information of their clients which they have learned in the course of their practice and have the right to refuse to testify for them. The initial determination of the system originated from the lawyer's "honor theory" put forward by the British jurist Wigmore, and then many scholars put forward the views of "privacy theory", "utilitarian theory" and "trust theory" one after another. In the end, the "trust theory" was generally accepted. The view is that the lawyer's secrecy system is based on the client's trust in the lawyer and aims to ensure full and frank communication between the client and the lawyer in order to obtain better legal services. Because the lawyer secrecy system requires that the lawyer strictly abide by the professional ethics, there must be a certain conflict between the lawyer and the obligation to discover the truth. Lawyers are distinguished from ordinary citizens because the profession has higher ethical requirements. Lawyers should choose strict professional secrets, which plays a positive role in safeguarding the equality of prosecution and defense, protecting human rights and promoting the development of lawyer profession. In the construction of lawyer's secrecy system, the main body should include related assistant in addition to practicing lawyer. The confidential contents include personal privacy, trade secret and state secret, and the case information obtained by lawyers in the case of representation, which has certain expansibility. It includes not only the information exchanged between lawyer and client, but also the secret and information learned between lawyer and third party. Violations of the lawyer's secrecy system are subject to administrative, civil and criminal penalties. When the information is or will seriously endanger the personal safety of others and the interests of national security, or the secrets learned in the practice of lawyers can play a protective role for innocent persons, minors and pregnant women, The lawyer's privilege of secrecy will be denied. The localization of lawyers in our country has gone through the transformation from the original national legal workers to the social legal workers, and the lack of the development of the rule of law leads to the lack of clarity in the position of lawyers in the society. The general concept of society holds that lawyers bear the responsibility of discovering the truth similar to that of the public security bureau, procuratorate and court, and the rights of the parties concerned cannot be fully protected. In addition, in the construction of our lawyer's secrecy system, there are some problems, such as unclear basis of confidentiality right, incomplete exception to confidentiality, too broad provisions of confidential content, vague specific procedures, and no special crimes against professional secrets. In addition, the existing crime of leakage of information in closed cases lacks relevant judicial explanations, the scope of non-disclosure is not clear, the existing lawyer secrecy system lacks specific guidance to lawyers in practice, and the secrecy system runs poorly. Lawyers bear certain professional risks. Therefore, we should perfect the contents of our lawyer's secrecy system, distinguish the classified contents, increase lawyers' right to refuse to testify and special criminal charges, establish corresponding safeguard procedures, form a hierarchical punishment mechanism, and give full play to the role of the Bar Association. Speeding up the construction of the communication and mobile mechanism between the lawyers and the court procuratorates will help to improve the practice environment of lawyers, protect the legal rights of lawyers, and give play to the important role of lawyers in the construction of socialist society ruled by law.
【学位授予单位】:安徽大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D926.5
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 付晓雅;;《中华人民共和国刑法修正案(九)》专题研究[J];法学杂志;2015年11期
2 韩旭;;《刑法修正案(九)》实施后如何善待律师权利——兼论泄露案件信息罪和扰乱法庭秩序罪的理解与适用[J];法治研究;2015年06期
3 吴林生;;刑法修正案(九)草案的得失及修改建议[J];中国刑事法杂志;2015年01期
4 林瑞利;;关于刑事辩护律师保密义务的思考[J];法制与社会;2014年22期
5 熊理思;;论刑事诉讼中的辩护律师保密特权——兼评新《刑事诉讼法》第46条[J];金陵法律评论;2013年02期
6 熊理思;高飞;;中美刑辩律师保密特权制度的比较与启示[J];上海公安高等专科学校学报;2014年02期
7 许身健;;欧美律师职业伦理比较研究[J];国家检察官学院学报;2014年01期
8 曹振;;我国律师保密权制度的不足及其完善[J];湖北警官学院学报;2013年11期
9 杨仕民;王乾坤;;从快乐湖沉尸案看律师的保密义务[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2013年02期
10 冯军;;论刑法解释的边界和路径——以扩张解释与类推适用的区分为中心[J];法学家;2012年01期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 屈玉麟;;浅析律师角色的社会定位[N];天津政法报;2014年
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 龙云辉;律师权利研究[D];重庆大学;2008年
2 程滔;辩护律师的诉讼权利研究[D];中国政法大学;2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 傅世传;法治新视野下的律师拒证权制度研析[D];上海交通大学;2009年
2 高蕾;论辩护律师职业秘密的保护:反思、比较与构建[D];中国政法大学;2008年
,本文编号:2146318
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2146318.html