论“量刑规范化”

发布时间：2018-07-28 15:58

【摘要】：规范量刑,减少量刑偏差和量刑失衡是世界范围内的难题。近年来,由于国内各地法院的量刑尺度不一,导致许多同案不同罚问题的出现,特别是在“宽严相济”刑事政策出台后,量刑的地区差异越来越严重。有鉴于此,我国将量刑规范化改革纳入到人民法院第三个五年改革纲要的重点工作中。刑法作为国家制定的最严厉的一部法律,其目的能否实现以及实现的程度取决于该法能否得到很好地适用,即法院能否很好地去定罪量刑。量刑规范化是关系到公民以及法人的权利、司法公正、社会稳定的重要举措,因此,对量刑规范化进行积极的探索具有重大的理论和现实意义。深入研究量刑规范化,有利于提高审判效率、维护司法公正和法律的权威性,同时,也有助于推动我国社会主义法治国家的建设。本文采用文献研究法、实证研究法、个案研究法、探索性研究法以及经验总结法等研究方法。通过对量刑规范化进行研究,分析出其在实务操作中存在哪些具体的问题,只有找到问题之所在才能推进量刑规范化改革的发展。因此,本文从量刑规范化的概念入手,提出其定义、内容、理论依据,并阐述和分析了美国《联邦量刑指南》和英国量刑程序的发展以及对我国量刑规范化改革的借鉴意义。结合其发展状况论述量刑规范化的价值取向,即,规范刑事诉讼程序、实现刑罚的实质正义、维护法律权威性和司法公信力。在肯定量刑规范化存在的必要性的同时,本文分析了其在操作过程中暴露的一系列问题,并提出了合理化建议,并强调我国的量刑规范化改革必须与我国立法发展和司法解释的完善紧密结合,要把我们的研究成果及时有效地反映到立法和司法解释中。
[Abstract]:Standardizing sentencing, reducing sentencing deviation and sentencing imbalance is a difficult problem in the world. In recent years, due to the different sentencing standards of various courts in China, many cases of different penalties appear, especially after the criminal policy of "justice with mercy", the regional differences in sentencing are becoming more and more serious. In view of this, our country brings the reform of sentencing standardization into the key work of the third five-year reform outline of the people's court. As one of the most severe laws made by our country, the purpose and the degree of realization of criminal law depend on whether the law can be well applied, that is, whether the court can well convict and sentence. The standardization of sentencing is an important measure related to the rights of citizens and legal persons, judicial justice and social stability. Therefore, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to actively explore the standardization of sentencing. Further study on the standardization of sentencing is beneficial to the improvement of judicial efficiency, the maintenance of judicial justice and the authority of the law, and also helps to promote the construction of a socialist country ruled by law in our country. This paper adopts the methods of literature research, empirical research, case study, exploratory research and experience summary. Through the study of sentencing standardization, the author analyzes what concrete problems exist in practical operation, and only find out where the problem lies, can we promote the development of sentencing standardization reform. Therefore, this article starts with the concept of sentencing standardization, puts forward its definition, content and theoretical basis, and expounds and analyzes the development of the United States Federal sentencing Guide and the British sentencing procedure and the significance of reference to the reform of sentencing standardization in our country. Combined with its development, this paper discusses the value orientation of sentencing standardization, that is, standardizing criminal procedure, realizing the substantive justice of penalty, maintaining the authority of law and judicial credibility. While affirming the necessity of the standardization of sentencing, this paper analyzes a series of problems exposed in the course of operation, and puts forward some reasonable suggestions. It is emphasized that the reform of sentencing standardization in our country must be closely combined with the development of legislation and the perfection of judicial interpretation, and our research results should be reflected in legislation and judicial interpretation in a timely and effective manner.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D924.13;D926.2

【参考文献】