最高人民法院司法解释“立法化”问题研究

发布时间：2018-08-29 20:14

【摘要】：世界大多数国家的法治实践均有司法解释的存在,基于各种原因,立法的缺陷往往难以避免,而司法解释则是缘于立法滞后的选择。然而面对诸多立法的缺陷,并不是所有的不足都可以简单的依靠司法解释加以解决,有的缺陷只能通过立法来加以修改和完善。如果司法权过分的侵入这一领域,无疑是越俎代庖,不仅有损立法权的权威,更与完善法制、维护法制统一以及增进社会正义的目标背道而驰。不可否认,由于受立法技术、司法体制、价值观念及法官能力的综合影响,我国司法解释的“泛立法化”现象有其存在的逻辑必然性,但正如一位论者所说,其逻辑必然性并不能证成其正当性与合理性,对此我们应充分剖析司法解释“立法化”背后折射出的深层法理问题,从而摆正司法机关在我国法制建设中的角色,使司法解释的应有功能得到最优发挥。本课题的研究内容主要有五部分组成: 第一部分首先对司法解释在中国的演进历程予以介绍分析,最高人民法院司法解释的发展过程即为司法解释异化为准立法的过程。在此基础上进一步总结司法解释“立法化”在内容、程序、效力、形式等方面的表现,从而对司法解释“立法化”在表现形式上予以初步界定。第二部分:导致司法解释“立法化”的因素是多方面的,这一部分从社会现实和学理角度对我国司法解释“立法化”的成因予以分析,在证成其违法性前,承认其存在的具有历史必然性,只有在此基础上,才能对司法解释“立法化”问题作出客观的剖析。第三部分:在上一部分提出问题的基础上对其进行进一步的分析探讨,司法解释“立法化”的客观必然性并不能从逻辑上说明其合法性与合理性。其本身存在违法性的问题,并在司法实践的过程中引发了一系列的问题和争议。这一部分即从体制和学理两方面概括司法解释“立法化”的违法性所在。第四部分:在上一部分司法解释范围规划的基础上,针对我国司法解释的现状从法理和实务两方面分别提出一系列改革措施。第五部分:结语,本部分是在前文探讨的基础上的一种总结。
[Abstract]:The practice of the rule of law in most countries of the world has the existence of judicial interpretation, for various reasons, the defects of legislation are often unavoidable, and judicial interpretation is due to the choice of lagging legislation. However, in the face of many defects of legislation, not all shortcomings can be simply solved by judicial interpretation, and some defects can only be modified and improved by legislation. If the judicial power invades this field, it is not only harmful to the authority of the legislative power, but also contrary to the goal of perfecting the legal system, maintaining the unity of the legal system and promoting social justice. Undeniably, due to the comprehensive influence of legislative technology, judicial system, values and judges' ability, the phenomenon of "pan-legislation" of judicial interpretation in our country has its logical inevitability, but just as one theorist said, Its logical inevitability can not prove its legitimacy and rationality, so we should fully analyze the deep legal problems reflected behind the "legalization" of judicial interpretation, so as to correct the role of judicial organs in the construction of our country's legal system. Make the proper function of judicial explanation get the best play. The research content of this topic has five parts: the first part introduces and analyzes the evolution of judicial interpretation in China. The development process of judicial interpretation of Supreme people's Court is the process of dissimilation of judicial interpretation. On this basis, the author further summarizes the performance of "legalization" of judicial interpretation in the aspects of content, procedure, effect, form, and so on, so as to give a preliminary definition of the expression form of "legalization" of judicial interpretation. The second part: there are many factors leading to the legalization of judicial interpretation. This part analyzes the causes of the legalization of judicial interpretation in China from the point of view of social reality and theory. Only on the basis of acknowledging the historical inevitability of its existence can we make an objective analysis of the issue of "legalization" of judicial interpretation. The third part: on the basis of the questions raised in the previous part, the objective inevitability of "legislation" in judicial interpretation can not logically explain its legitimacy and rationality. Its own illegal problem, and in the process of judicial practice caused a series of problems and disputes. This part generalizes the illegality of judicial interpretation from the aspects of system and theory. The fourth part: on the basis of the scope planning of judicial interpretation in the last part, a series of reform measures are put forward in view of the present situation of judicial interpretation in China from two aspects: legal theory and practice. The fifth part: conclusion, this part is a summary based on the previous discussion.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】