行政法视阈下的监狱自由裁量权
发布时间:2018-09-03 10:28
【摘要】:在社会民主和法治条件下,法律终止之处,乃是执法者自由裁量权发轫之地。监狱刑事执行立法滞后与经济社会发展要求、成文法的局限性与监狱实践的广泛性之间的矛盾,决定了监狱警察由裁量权存在的可能性和必要性。监狱自由裁量权是监狱为实现对罪犯的教育改造工作,根据法律、法规所确定的原则、范围和幅度,并结合罪犯的具体情况,对在押罪犯的分级处遇、教育、奖罚、组织劳动等作出灵活处理的权力。其具有法定性、自主选择性、相对性和特定性等特征。 执法过程的性质、成文法之局限性、监狱行刑的个别公正以及监狱管理之高效、我国的特殊国情和监狱管理自身特点是监狱自由裁量权存在的法理基础和社会基础。监狱警察自由裁量权的广泛适用成为警察完成监狱行刑和管理工作的基本手段和重要特点。但自由裁量权的存在既是对监狱法治的有力补充,也是对监狱法治的破坏,自由裁量的机会日益增多,监狱警察滥用自由裁量权的可能性就越来越大。为了追求和实现法律的公平与公正,必须最大限度地减少警察自由裁量权的滥用,加强对警察自由裁量权的控制。
[Abstract]:Under the conditions of social democracy and rule of law, the place where the law terminates is the birthplace of the law enforcement's discretion. The contradiction between the lag of prison criminal execution legislation and the requirement of economic and social development, the limitation of statutory law and the universality of prison practice determine the possibility and necessity of the existence of the discretion of prison police. The discretion of the prison is that the prison, in order to realize the education and reform of the criminals, according to the principles, scope and extent determined by the laws and regulations, and combined with the specific conditions of the criminals, to the treatment, education, reward and punishment of prisoners, The power to organize labor, etc in a flexible manner. It has the characteristics of legality, autonomous selectivity, relativity and specificity. The nature of the law enforcement process, the limitations of statutory law, the individual justice of prison execution and the high efficiency of prison management, the special situation of our country and the characteristics of prison management itself are the legal and social basis of the existence of prison discretion. The wide application of the discretion of the prison police becomes the basic means and important characteristics for the police to complete the execution and management of the prison. However, the existence of discretion is not only a powerful complement to the rule of law in prison, but also a violation of the rule of law in prison. With the increasing opportunities of discretion, the possibility of abuse of discretion by prison police becomes greater and greater. In order to pursue and realize the fairness and justice of the law, we must minimize the abuse of the discretion of the police and strengthen the control of the discretion of the police.
【学位授予单位】:黑龙江大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D922.1;D926.7
本文编号:2219714
[Abstract]:Under the conditions of social democracy and rule of law, the place where the law terminates is the birthplace of the law enforcement's discretion. The contradiction between the lag of prison criminal execution legislation and the requirement of economic and social development, the limitation of statutory law and the universality of prison practice determine the possibility and necessity of the existence of the discretion of prison police. The discretion of the prison is that the prison, in order to realize the education and reform of the criminals, according to the principles, scope and extent determined by the laws and regulations, and combined with the specific conditions of the criminals, to the treatment, education, reward and punishment of prisoners, The power to organize labor, etc in a flexible manner. It has the characteristics of legality, autonomous selectivity, relativity and specificity. The nature of the law enforcement process, the limitations of statutory law, the individual justice of prison execution and the high efficiency of prison management, the special situation of our country and the characteristics of prison management itself are the legal and social basis of the existence of prison discretion. The wide application of the discretion of the prison police becomes the basic means and important characteristics for the police to complete the execution and management of the prison. However, the existence of discretion is not only a powerful complement to the rule of law in prison, but also a violation of the rule of law in prison. With the increasing opportunities of discretion, the possibility of abuse of discretion by prison police becomes greater and greater. In order to pursue and realize the fairness and justice of the law, we must minimize the abuse of the discretion of the police and strengthen the control of the discretion of the police.
【学位授予单位】:黑龙江大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D922.1;D926.7
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 张坚;;论监狱自由裁量权及其控制[J];法学评论;2007年06期
2 陶新胜;;论监狱警察自由裁量权的控制[J];法制与社会;2009年26期
3 程书琴;论行政诉讼受案范围[J];广西社会科学;2003年01期
4 王英津;论我国的行政自由裁量权及其滥用防范[J];国家行政学院学报;2001年03期
5 杨解君;行政违法的判断[J];法制与社会发展;1997年06期
6 姜明安;行政的现代化与行政程序制度[J];法制与社会发展;1998年02期
7 郭润生,宋功德;论行政自由裁量权[J];山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1997年03期
8 伯纳德·施瓦茨;徐炳;;关于行政程序的几个问题[J];环球法律评论;1983年06期
9 郭建华;行政程序法律化是依法治国的重要途径[J];行政论坛;1998年02期
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 徐一凡;论行政自由裁量权及其司法审查[D];吉林大学;2005年
2 刘俊;行政自由裁量权研究[D];苏州大学;2004年
3 付建学;论税务机关自由裁量权[D];吉林大学;2005年
4 冯俊波;论对行政自由裁量权的程序性控制[D];中国政法大学;2006年
5 黄永莉;社会公平视角下的行政自由裁量权研究[D];湖南大学;2008年
,本文编号:2219714
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2219714.html

