缓刑执行中的检察监督问题研究

发布时间：2018-09-04 11:04

【摘要】：自从1979年《刑法》中明确规定缓刑制度以来,缓刑制度在司法实践中的适用比例不但相当的低,而且缓刑执行过程中的脱管、漏管现象也是非常严重。然而,这种情况自从2003年社区矫正试点工作在我国部分省市开始实施后出现很大变化,缓刑犯被规定作为社区矫正的五类对象之一,缓刑在司法实践中的适用比例越来越大,缓刑制度也逐步焕发出新的活力。虽然相较于试点工作开始之前,司法实践中缓刑执行过程中脱管、漏管的现象有所减少,但是和缓刑在社区矫正中所占的日渐增长的比重相比,缓刑执行过程中的缺陷已经不仅仅是其本身的问题了,而是已经成为关系到社区矫正工作成败的大事,因此加强对缓刑执行过程中的监督也就势在必行了。那么应该如何解决缓刑执行过程中的监督问题成为了当前司法实践中的一个大难题。在国外,特别是西方发达国家,缓刑执行中的监督考察除了国家力量的参与外,还有更多的民间组织和社会帮教力量充分参与其中,这得益于国外发展成熟的市民社会,这也是缓刑这种社会化行刑方式能够在西方发达国家大范围应用的重要原因之一。但是在我国,因为商品经济发展时间还非常短,市民社会发展不够充分,所以很难有足够的社会力量参与到缓刑执行过程中,有鉴于此,作为国家法定法律监督机构的检察机关就责无旁贷了,而且加强对缓刑执行过程的检查监督也是检察机关履行刑罚执行监督职能的一部分。那么如何解决检察机关在缓刑执行过程中的监督问题呢? 除引言和结语外,本文可以分为三个部分：第一部分,是缓刑执行过程中的监督情况概述。这部分首先界定缓刑执行过程中的检察监督含义；其次对国外缓刑执行过程中的监督制度考察。第二部分,是我国缓刑执行过程中检察监督所存在的问题。这部分首先介绍了缓刑执行中检察监督法律依据的不明确,其次介绍了执行主体多元化对检察监督工作的影响,再次介绍了缓刑执行过程中检察监督方式的单一,最后介绍了检察机关本身对缓刑监督的资源投入不足。第三部分,完善我国解决缓刑执行过程中检察监督措施的建议。这部分针对第二部分中的问题提供了一些建议,以期能够对解决缓刑执行过程中缺乏有效监督的问题有所裨益,完善我国的缓刑执行过程中的监督制度,同时能够充分发挥缓刑这种非监禁方式刑罚方式在社区矫正中的作用,从而促进我国社区矫正制度的完善。
[Abstract]:Since the system of probation was clearly stipulated in the Criminal Law in 1979, the application ratio of probation system in judicial practice is not only quite low, but also in the process of probation execution, the phenomenon of leakage is very serious. However, this situation has changed greatly since the pilot work of community correction began to be implemented in some provinces and cities of China in 2003. Probation offenders have been stipulated as one of the five kinds of objects of community correction, and the proportion of probation in judicial practice has been increasing. Probation system also gradually coruscated with new vitality. Although, compared with the beginning of the pilot work, in judicial practice, the phenomenon of taking off the tube and leaking the tube during the execution of the suspended sentence has been reduced, but compared with the increasing proportion of probation in community correction, The defects in the process of probation execution are not only its own problems, but also become a major event related to the success or failure of community correction work. Therefore, it is imperative to strengthen the supervision of probation implementation process. So how to solve the problem of supervision in the process of probation has become a big problem in the current judicial practice. In foreign countries, especially in western developed countries, in addition to the participation of state forces, there are more non-governmental organizations and social help and education forces fully involved in the supervision and inspection of probation implementation. This has benefited from the development of a mature civil society abroad. This is also one of the important reasons why the social execution of probation can be widely used in western developed countries. But in our country, because the development time of commodity economy is still very short and the development of civil society is not enough, it is very difficult to have enough social forces to participate in the probation process. In view of this, The procuratorial organ, as a legal supervisory organ of the state, is duty-bound, and it is also a part of the procuratorial organ to perform the function of supervising the execution of penalty. So how to solve the procuratorial organs in the process of probation supervision? In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper can be divided into three parts: the first part is a summary of the supervision during the execution of probation. This part firstly defines the meaning of procuratorial supervision in the process of probation execution, and then inspects the supervision system in the process of probation execution abroad. The second part is the problems of procuratorial supervision in the execution of probation in China. This part firstly introduces the unclear legal basis of procuratorial supervision in the execution of probation, secondly introduces the influence of the diversification of executive subjects on the procuratorial supervision, and then introduces the single way of procuratorial supervision in the process of execution of suspended sentence. At last, the author introduces the shortage of resources invested by procuratorial organ to probation supervision. The third part, consummates our country to solve the probation execution process the procuratorial supervision measure suggestion. This part provides some suggestions for the problems in the second part, in order to solve the problem of lack of effective supervision in the process of probation implementation, and improve the supervision system in the process of probation implementation in our country. At the same time, it can give full play to the role of suspended sentence in community correction, thus promoting the improvement of community correction system in our country.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D924.13;D926.3

【参考文献】