宪政视野下的陪审制度研究

发布时间：2018-11-16 12:40

【摘要】：陪审制度在西方的发展根基相当深厚，，对我国来说，它是纯粹的舶来品，引入我国未逾百年，但陪审制度蕴含的民主、正义、自由等内容却是我国宪政建设与司法改革一贯秉寻的宗旨。与西方的参审、陪审团模式不同，我国采用的是极具中国特色的人民陪审员制度，它在保障民主人权、司法正义、权利制约等方面起到了重要作用，同时，它还是一架沟通国家与民意的桥梁。当然，该制度在我国司法实践中仍然遇到了诸多不可回避的问题，笔者拟从宪政的视域，阐述陪审制度的起源及其内含的宪政价值。本文共分为七大部分，第一部分引言提出写作本篇论文的原因，第七部分结语是对陪审制度的未来进行展望，正文部分主要论述：第一章，介绍陪审制度的概念和起源。首先对陪审制度的有关概念给出系统、严密的定义，避免论文因概念指代混淆造成语言歧义。接着，分析陪审制度的特征；最后，从古希腊古代陪审制度、信息调查制度、多源论三种观点探究陪审制度的起源。第二章，陪审制度的宪政价值：基于美、法为代表的两大陪审模式的分析。通过对美国陪审团制度与法国参审制的分析，吸取西方两大经典陪审模式的精华，从而追溯陪审制度的宪政价值。笔者旨在通过对政治民主、司法公正、权力制约等价值的深入探索，总结出我国值得借鉴学习之处。第三章，介绍中国陪审制度的宪政历程和社会价值。细述中国陪审制度从萌芽到确立、复兴发展三个阶段的历史剪影，窥见中国选择人民陪审员制度的宪政法律及历史背景，从而揭示中国陪审制度的社会功能和价值。第四章，以笔者亲身实践为依托，阐述中国人民陪审员制度的运行现状和缺陷。在立足我国现实的基础上，分别从民主层面、权力制约层面、司法公正层面着手，引用真实范例、最新数据进行论证。第五章，我国人民陪审员制度的宪政完善，打破陪审制度传统研究模式，不再对我国人民陪审员制度的细节内容进行重构、设计或武断废弃，而是站在一个新的高度，在宪政的视野下，提出完善人民陪审员制度的几点诚恳建议。本文意在通过对各国陪审制度的历史进程、陪审模式、陪审的宪政理念、我国人民陪审员制度现状问题的梳理中，从宪政思维方式入手寻求我国陪审制度的出路，具有较重要的学术价值和实践指导意义。
[Abstract]:The development of jury system in the West is very deep, for our country, it is a pure import, the introduction of our country has not been more than 100 years, but the jury system contains democracy, justice, Freedom and other contents are the tenet of constitutional construction and judicial reform in our country. Different from the trial and jury models in the West, our country adopts a people's jury system with Chinese characteristics, which plays an important role in safeguarding democratic human rights, judicial justice, rights restriction, and so on. It is also a bridge between the state and public opinion. Of course, the system still meets many unavoidable problems in the judicial practice of our country. The author intends to expound the origin of the jury system and its constitutional value from the perspective of constitutionalism. This paper is divided into seven parts. The first part introduces the reasons for writing this paper. The seventh part is the conclusion of the future of the jury system, the main body of the discussion: the first chapter, introduces the concept and origin of jury system. Firstly, this paper gives a systematic and strict definition of the relevant concepts of jury system to avoid language ambiguity caused by conceptual confusion. Then, the characteristics of jury system are analyzed. Finally, the origin of jury system is explored from three viewpoints: ancient Greek jury system, information investigation system and multi-source theory. The second chapter, the constitutional value of jury system: based on the analysis of the two major jury models represented by beauty and law. Through the analysis of American jury system and French jury system, the essence of the western two classical jury models is drawn, and the constitutional value of the jury system can be traced back. The author aims to sum up the value of political democracy, judicial justice, power restriction and so on. Chapter three introduces the constitutional course and social value of Chinese jury system. This paper expounds the historical silhouette of the three stages of the Chinese jury system from the bud to the establishment and the revival and development, and explores the constitutional law and historical background of China's choice of the people's jury system, thus revealing the social function and value of the Chinese jury system. The fourth chapter, based on the author's own practice, expounds the current situation and defects of the Chinese people's jury system. Based on the reality of our country, it starts from the democratic level, the power restriction level, the judicial justice level, quotes the real example, the newest data carries on the demonstration. The fifth chapter, the constitutional perfection of the people's jury system of our country, breaks the traditional research mode of the jury system, and no longer reconstructs, designs or arbitrarily discards the details of the people's jury system of our country, but stands at a new height. Under the vision of constitutionalism, some sincere suggestions are put forward to perfect the system of people's jurors. The purpose of this paper is to seek the outlet of the jury system of our country through the historical process, the jury mode, the constitutional concept of the jury system, the present situation of the people's jury system of our country and the way of constitutional thinking. It has important academic value and practical significance.
【学位授予单位】：中南民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926.2

【相似文献】