我国能动司法研究
发布时间：2018-12-28 08:37
【摘要】：近几十年来我国社会发生了巨大的改变，加入世界贸易组织使我国的经济又实现了新的飞跃。我国也正处于经济体制转型的关键时期，很多突发事件、公共事件、自然灾害频繁的发生，处理不得当就会引发范围扩大、人数更多的社会矛盾，处理好这些纠纷，稳定社会秩序是保证我国经济又好又快发展、维护人民群众合法利益的重要环节。面对新时期复杂的经济环境，我国最高法院王胜俊院长提出了在全国开展能动司法活动以应对不断出现的社会纠纷。目前能动司法活动已经在全国轰轰烈烈的开展起来，，但就能动司法的理论体系还没有完全建立起来。关于能动司法是什么？能动司法的性质如何？能动司法的标准是什么？能动司法的实践是什么？无论是学界还是司法界都还在进行热烈的讨论，理论和实践都在摸索中进行，相信通过实践上升到理论再由理论指导实践到实践检验理论的过程会不断的完善能动司法的理论体系。 本文主要是从我国能动司法的理论分析入手，对我国目前关于能动司法的理论进行介绍，包括能动司法的概念、性质和特征，总结了一些关于能动司法的大概的、比较一致的看法。然后对司法能动主义进行了考察，司法能动主义是如何产生的，怎样发展的，司法能动主义的理论与实践，以及在理论上以及实践中能动司法主义与司法克制之间的争论，将司法能动主义与能动司法进行比较，分析其相似和不同，从司法能动主义的理论和实践中得到的启示。最后对我国能动司法的现状进行了分析，阐述了能动司法的优点和不足，以及能动司法需要注意的几个问题。本文运用了历史分析法，社会分析法和比较分析法通过对我国的能动司法与西方司法能动主义的进行分析与比较，发现我国能动司法的不足学习和借鉴司法能动主义的经验和教训，对我国的能动司法理论实践体系的完善提几点建议。不能否认现实主义法学在全世界范围内已经占据了主导地位，无论是司法能动还是司法能动主义都是现实主义法学思潮对司法的现实影响与作用，作为世界大国全球经济的一份子，中国的态度和做法都会对世界产生很大的以影响，结合中国的国情，走出既符合中国国情又能适应全球发展的能动司法的道路势在必行，因此在理论和实践中还要继续探索，不断检验、完善我国能动司法理论。
[Abstract]:In recent decades, great changes have taken place in our society, and China's economy has made a new leap after joining the World Trade Organization (WTO). Our country is also in a critical period of economic restructuring. Many emergencies, public events, and natural disasters occur frequently. If not properly handled, it will lead to a wider range of social contradictions and a better handling of these disputes. Stable social order is an important link to ensure the sound and rapid development of our economy and safeguard the legitimate interests of the people. Facing the complex economic environment in the new period, President Wang Shengjun of the Supreme Court of our country put forward to carry out active judicial activities in the whole country to deal with the social disputes. At present, active judicial activities have been carried out in the country, but the theoretical system of active justice has not been completely established. What about active justice? What is the nature of active justice? What is the standard of active justice? What is the practice of active justice? Both the academic and judicial circles are still engaged in heated discussions, and both theory and practice are in the process of exploration. It is believed that the theoretical system of active judicature will be continuously perfected through the process of practice to theory and then from theory to practice. This paper mainly starts with the theoretical analysis of active justice in our country, introduces the theory of active justice in our country, including the concept, nature and characteristics of active justice, and summarizes some general ideas about active justice. A more consistent view. Then it investigates judicial activism, how it comes into being, how it develops, the theory and practice of judicial activism, and the controversy between judicial activism and judicial restraint in theory and practice. This paper compares judicial activism with active judicature, analyzes its similarities and differences, and draws inspiration from the theory and practice of judicial activism. Finally, this paper analyzes the present situation of active justice in our country, expounds the advantages and disadvantages of active justice, and points out several problems needing attention in active justice. This paper uses the historical analysis method, the social analysis method and the comparative analysis method to analyze and compare the active judicature in our country and the judicial activism in the west. It is found that the deficiency of active justice in our country and the experience and lessons of judicial activism are used for reference, and some suggestions are put forward to perfect the system of active judicial theory and practice in our country. It can not be denied that realistic jurisprudence has occupied a dominant position in the world. Whether it is judicial initiative or judicial activism, it is the realistic influence and function of the realistic legal trend of thought to the judicature. As a member of the global economy of a world power, China's attitude and practices will have a great impact on the world. It is imperative that, in combination with China's national conditions, we should walk the path of dynamic justice that is both in line with China's national conditions and can adapt to global development. Therefore, in theory and practice, we should continue to explore, constantly test, and improve our active judicial theory.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926
本文编号：2393738
[Abstract]:In recent decades, great changes have taken place in our society, and China's economy has made a new leap after joining the World Trade Organization (WTO). Our country is also in a critical period of economic restructuring. Many emergencies, public events, and natural disasters occur frequently. If not properly handled, it will lead to a wider range of social contradictions and a better handling of these disputes. Stable social order is an important link to ensure the sound and rapid development of our economy and safeguard the legitimate interests of the people. Facing the complex economic environment in the new period, President Wang Shengjun of the Supreme Court of our country put forward to carry out active judicial activities in the whole country to deal with the social disputes. At present, active judicial activities have been carried out in the country, but the theoretical system of active justice has not been completely established. What about active justice? What is the nature of active justice? What is the standard of active justice? What is the practice of active justice? Both the academic and judicial circles are still engaged in heated discussions, and both theory and practice are in the process of exploration. It is believed that the theoretical system of active judicature will be continuously perfected through the process of practice to theory and then from theory to practice. This paper mainly starts with the theoretical analysis of active justice in our country, introduces the theory of active justice in our country, including the concept, nature and characteristics of active justice, and summarizes some general ideas about active justice. A more consistent view. Then it investigates judicial activism, how it comes into being, how it develops, the theory and practice of judicial activism, and the controversy between judicial activism and judicial restraint in theory and practice. This paper compares judicial activism with active judicature, analyzes its similarities and differences, and draws inspiration from the theory and practice of judicial activism. Finally, this paper analyzes the present situation of active justice in our country, expounds the advantages and disadvantages of active justice, and points out several problems needing attention in active justice. This paper uses the historical analysis method, the social analysis method and the comparative analysis method to analyze and compare the active judicature in our country and the judicial activism in the west. It is found that the deficiency of active justice in our country and the experience and lessons of judicial activism are used for reference, and some suggestions are put forward to perfect the system of active judicial theory and practice in our country. It can not be denied that realistic jurisprudence has occupied a dominant position in the world. Whether it is judicial initiative or judicial activism, it is the realistic influence and function of the realistic legal trend of thought to the judicature. As a member of the global economy of a world power, China's attitude and practices will have a great impact on the world. It is imperative that, in combination with China's national conditions, we should walk the path of dynamic justice that is both in line with China's national conditions and can adapt to global development. Therefore, in theory and practice, we should continue to explore, constantly test, and improve our active judicial theory.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张榕;;司法能动性何以实现?——以最高人民法院司法解释为分析基础[J];法律科学(西北政法学院学报);2007年05期
2 范愉;;诉前调解与法院的社会责任 从司法社会化到司法能动主义[J];法律适用;2007年11期
3 公丕祥;;坚持司法能动 依法服务大局 对江苏法院金融危机司法应对工作的初步总结与思考[J];法律适用;2009年11期
4 公丕祥;;能动司法与社会公信:人民法官司法方式的时代选择——“陈燕萍工作法”的理论思考[J];法律适用;2010年04期
5 苏力;;关于能动司法[J];法律适用;2010年Z1期
6 顾培东;;司法能动主义的蕴含[J];法律适用;2010年Z1期
7 侯淑雯;;司法衡平艺术与司法能动主义[J];法学研究;2007年01期
8 吴英姿;;司法的限度:在司法能动与司法克制之间[J];法学研究;2009年05期
9 江必新;;能动司法:依据、空间和限度——关于能动司法的若干思考和体会[J];人民司法;2010年01期
10 吴英姿;;风险时代的秩序重建与法治信念——以“能动司法”为对象的讨论[J];法学论坛;2011年01期
本文编号：2393738
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2393738.html
